Ok.
But people have mentionned here in the forum that there were better defragmenters than Windows defrag'...

Yeah, a defrag' can't really bug a system. My mistake.

Unless your system is configured with many and very large and complex storage volumes for similarly complex applications that require being available non-stop, there are no needs for anything beyond the in-box defragmenter.

--svb

Without hesitation, O&O Defrag! http://www.oo-software.com/

I disagree with SVoba--there are many advantages to a defrag utliity other then the one that comes with XP---I use Executive Diskeeper---they have a lite version for free. Its very fast--much more so then XP and gives you a host of options that XP doesn't---I defrag often and find the speed to be critical

I also use Executive Diskeeper and have had very good success with it.

I indicated on a survey that I had a Diskeeper technical question, no problem with the program; just a question, and their technical support kept tracking me down until they could talk with me and answer my question. I was very impressed.

Diskeeper is significantly faster than either Norton Speed Disk or XP built in defrag. I hear that the built in XP defrag is built on Diskeeper, but not nearly as fast or deluxe.

If you are looking for a defragger that will maintain your disk defragmentation; I have 6 120 GB hard drives, do it fast, and do it well, Diskeeper is the way to go.

another vote for Diskeeper here!

I vote for Raxco PerfectDisk2000. I tried Diskeeper about a year ago and was quite disappointed with it - I could never get it to consolidate all the free disk space

Scott

Thanks for suggestions guys, I'm gonna check it out!