drbam wrote on 4/21/2005, 1:56 PM
Well I suppose we could copy and paste the many dozens that have already been made regarding our hopes for Vegas 6. They have been discussed in depth, in detail over and over again in this forum and were forwarded to the "suggestion box" by several people so obviously this would be a waste of time at this point, but if you want to go for it, by all means. . .

The only suggestion I have is for Sony to treat the current audio users of Vegas fairly and work out some sort of equitable solution to the absurd notion of paying $150 for a bug fix (metronome).

Rednroll wrote on 4/21/2005, 2:01 PM
deleted by moderator
randygo wrote on 4/21/2005, 2:03 PM

I'll offer Sony $50 for this update and sign an affadavit not to use any of the video features.

If Sony implements most of the oft requested audio features in the Vegas 7 release then I will offer upgrade price plus a premium.

I have a feeling Sony is unable to accept my money.

Spheris wrote on 4/21/2005, 2:20 PM

Makes for interesting reading as far as what Sony is and isn't as a corporation..Considering I've been sidelining watching the corporate teardown going around - when it's really only about a subsidiary going through some growing pains (even if at our expense for the last 12 or 18 months)

The other form is worthless (or so it seems) from what can be seen. Just a thought but you might want to drop a line to the real Sony and let them know how you might think about all this. You might even be shocked to find they might possibly answer you.
randygo wrote on 4/21/2005, 2:28 PM

Looks like the usual boilerplate corporate statements.

Actions speak louder than words.
Spheris wrote on 4/21/2005, 3:07 PM
Probably true to a point randy, but who exactly here has provided any of that action you're talking about?
James Young wrote on 4/21/2005, 3:12 PM
"I'll see if they make it into version 7." LOL