Comments

farss wrote on 8/23/2012, 6:31 AM
"does fast or slow pan/scan render better (meaning once compression is applied)"

Slow is better, well I guess if it's fast enough, like in the blink of an eye fast, no one will notice but otherwise with any temporal compression the less changes between frames the better.

That said, screen capture is usually pretty clean and with large areas of identical pixels, so it's pretty easy on the bandwidth. Still, if you're using low bandwidths stick to slow.

Bob.
JHendrix2 wrote on 8/23/2012, 6:35 AM
ok, i thought it would be opposite, but good to know.

in general, i assumed the more frames that had changes in pixels = the more compression of more frames seen by user
musicvid10 wrote on 8/23/2012, 6:52 AM
Faster motion = less compression efficiency.
More compression = less detail in motion areas.

Look up "interframe compression."

JJKizak wrote on 8/23/2012, 7:12 AM
Leaves and water are the real tests.
JJK