Suggestion: Batch Render

dstagl wrote on 9/1/1999, 4:22 PM
It would be really nice if in the future there was a batch
render option as either a plug-in or part of an upgrade.
On the current project I'm working on I have about
60 .AVI's I'm doing a soundtrack mix for and it'd be nice
if I could just tell it to render out final .WAV's
or .AVI's at the end of the project instead of one at a
time as I go.

Dave

Comments

LDTOWERS wrote on 11/9/1999, 3:05 AM
This is exactly the reason that support should be included for
hardware like the DSP factory. Who wants to render? The world is
heading towards realtime, 5.1 channel sound. Do you want to wait for
that to render?

Dave Stagl wrote:
>>It would be really nice if in the future there was a batch
>>render option as either a plug-in or part of an upgrade.
>>On the current project I'm working on I have about
>>60 .AVI's I'm doing a soundtrack mix for and it'd be nice
>>if I could just tell it to render out final .WAV's
>>or .AVI's at the end of the project instead of one at a
>>time as I go.
>>
>> Dave
pwppch wrote on 11/9/1999, 12:27 PM
Far from it!

Preparing media for delivery and "ownership" is by far the largest
market. Realtime streaming is important and our tools can be used for
this. Broadcast, web cast, etc, all important uses of realtime
streaming. Creating and delivering content for repeated use, whether
it is CD audio, DVD, MP3, what ever, is a far larger market.

What does the DSPF have to do with it? I mean what 5.1 problems does
the DSPF provide a soltion for? Streaming in realtime has nothing to
do with the hardware you monitor it through. The monitoring is done
on the end users system. Streaming in realtime is just a form of
rendering, with the destination being the playback device.

Explain to me how the DSPF can help with realtime streaming of
content?

Peter


LARRY TOWERS wrote:
>>This is exactly the reason that support should be included for
>>hardware like the DSP factory. Who wants to render? The world is
>>heading towards realtime, 5.1 channel sound. Do you want to wait
for
>>that to render?
>>
>>Dave Stagl wrote:
>>>>It would be really nice if in the future there was a batch
>>>>render option as either a plug-in or part of an upgrade.
>>>>On the current project I'm working on I have about
>>>>60 .AVI's I'm doing a soundtrack mix for and it'd be nice
>>>>if I could just tell it to render out final .WAV's
>>>>or .AVI's at the end of the project instead of one at a
>>>>time as I go.
>>>>
>>>> Dave