Considering DVD burning with Vegas : easy ?

Kommentare

yirm schrieb am 21.09.2002 um 22:00 Uhr
Why would that be? I mean, it uses the same CODECs. *shrug*

-Jeremy
yirm schrieb am 22.09.2002 um 21:45 Uhr
Okay, I won't shoot you. However, the post is ambiguous, as it points out one specific feature -- deinterlacing. It's not clear whether BC5 is worse in general, or only under the specific situation indicated -- when deinterlacing while encoding to MPEG1.

First of all, DVD encoding (which we are currently discussing) is MPEG2, as you no doubt are aware. Secondly, isn't it usually left interlaced? (I don't know, I'm asking.) I thought progressive videos were usually for computer playback. I know there are now progressive scan DVD players, but they are useless unless used with very expensive televisions. (I think this is an HDTV feature.) Anyway, normal NTSC television is interlaced, so perhaps BC5 is just as good as VV3 under normal DVD encoding conditions?

-Jeremy
SonyDennis schrieb am 24.09.2002 um 00:30 Uhr
If you're taking DV to MPEG-2, Batch Converter should be able to do that fine. But, if you're changing frame rates, scaling, needing deinterlacing, field rendering, or anything else, use Vegas, since it has a superior video engine for those operations.
///d@