OT: Cakewalk unethical anti-support

Rednroll schrieb am 26.10.2004 um 18:08 Uhr
For those of you who thought they ever got unsatisfactory support from Sony/Sonic Foundry let me share my recent experience with Cakewalk with you.

I purchased Ultrafunk's Sonitus: plugin pack v3.0. This plugin pack was purchased and now owned by Cakewalk. Recently I discovered that Cakewalk added DX automation capabilities to this plugin pack. I was therefore interested in visiting their website to find an update/upgrade option. There was none. In fact I was led to a page on their website that directly contradicted this information.

http://store.yahoo.com/cakewalkdirect/sonitus.html

Quotes from their website:
"Sonitus:fx is a series of professional audio processing tools for digital audio editing, sound design, games, multimedia, film or studio work. These plug-ins have been enhanced with DirectX automation, and can be use with SONAR, Home Studio, Project5 or any application supporting DirectX or VST."

"IMPORTANT NOTE: Registered users of SONAR 3 Producer Edition & Ultrafunk customers with Release 3x of the Sonitus:fx plug-ins do not need to upgrade. No changes were made beyond updating the UI to include the Cakewalk logo. All functionality remains the same."

All functionality remains the same? Then what does "These plug-ins have been enhanced with DirectX autiomation" mean?

I thought this might be an oversight on their part, so I went to their website looking for a way to contact support regarding this issue. I looked under alomost every link on their website entitled "support","download", "purchase" and "Products" headers on their main page for a way to contact them. I found nothing. My next step was that I posted a message in their user forums....there was no Sonitus forum, so I posted in the Sonar forum, thinking it would be the most likely to get a reply. I got many user replies, stating that yes this seems like a problem. No one from cakewalk. One user posted a techsupport contact link for me. I used that link to contact cakewalk's techsupport. 5 days later I got a tech support reply back stating, "This is a sales support issue, please contact our "Sales Support". The original message I sent was highly scrambled around and wasn't in my "Sent box", because the link I used was cakewalk's own message sending template. Therefore, instead of the techsupport just forwarding my message onto the proper support area, so that it could get properly addressed, now I had to go hunt for their "sales support" contact, which they didn't give me in the reply message, and also I had to rewrite my entire message. I became highly annoyed at this point. A user from their forum again, pointed me to the correct contact information, which was located under cakewalk's main page under the heading "About". I guess the "About" heading was the last place I would have thought about looking at for a support contact regarding a Sonitus plugin.

At this point I had 2 seperate threads going in the Sonar forum consisting of 50+ replies each, and had been viewed over 2000 times each. A hot topic like this, you can be gauranteed Sony would have addressed it in one manor or another from their support......but nothing from Cakewalk. The next step I contacted Cakewalk "Sales Support" as directed. I got a reply back in 4 days. Here's a quote from that reply:

"Thank you for contacting Cakewalk. We apologize for the delay in
response, but we have had a very high volume of email lately. You will
be able to upgrade to the newer version of the Sonitus:FX Suite for
$49.00."

They didn't mention how this transaction would be conducted and still on their webpage their was no "upgrade" offer for previous Ultrafunk users. So I posted this information to the user forums to update everyone that I had been having these discussion with. I later went back and my post with the above quote was not on the thread any longer. I thought maybe I made a mistake in posting , so I reposted the information. I went back the next day to the thread and again, the post was DELETED. After this, I was contacted via email by Cakewalk with the message below.

"Dear Brian,
The upgrade offer you were emailed is not available to the general
public and was offered as a courtesy to you directly. I apologize if
this wasn't made clear the first time around, but this matter could have
been quickly resolved by calling the toll-free Customer Service number
that was inlcuded in our email rather than posting to the user forums.
Please feel free to call 888-225-3925 to speak with a Customer Service
representative if you are interested in taking advantage of the offer or
for any assistance regarding Cakewalk products and services."


Wow!!!!! How's that for support? I just happen to be the squeaky wheel in this case. I was hoping they would have done the right thing and corrected their information on their website and offered other users like myself an "upgrade" option like the rest of their products offer. No such thing, instead they descide to oil the squeaky wheel and say screw the rest of our customer base who might have a simular situtuation. They even went as far as deleting 2 posts in their forums, which had the above $49.00 upgrade offer information, yet never posted one message in the thread to address the issue.

To make matters even worse, they don't even have any demo versions of the Sonitus pack, so that I could at least see if the automation in the plugins work in the Sony apps, before I even consider their personal upgrade offer.

To any of you considering purchasing Sonar or any other Cakewalk product, keep this story in mine. I've heard quite a few shared horror stories regarding Cakewalk and their support. Don't walk away from Cakewalk, but RUN!!! To me this is the most unethical offer I have ever seen and was mishandled throughout the Cakewalk company.

Update: Cakewalk just deleted the entire thread that this discussion was on. I guess the truth hurts when exposed.

Kommentare

farss schrieb am 26.10.2004 um 20:06 Uhr
Well I guess there's more than one lesson there, short of being offensive nothing gets deleted here, that says a lot more than most realise and the second one you already figured out, give their products a wide berth.
Isn't there another Sonar forum elsewhere, did you try Cow?
Rednroll schrieb am 26.10.2004 um 20:18 Uhr
Since Cakewalk took the liberty to delete an informative post, regarding a legitimate issue on their part.....regardless if they liked the information there or not, I have now took it upon myself to post my story in every audio forum available that Cakewalk can't delete.

I'm on a mission watch out!!!!
MJhig schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 00:17 Uhr
One of the biggest (well predominantly Twelve Tones), go for it:

Scott Garrigus , author of Sonar and Sound Forge Power.

You may have to register. There's two boards, one music (nice place) and an OT board where it get's serious at times ;-)

MJ
TheHappyFriar schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 01:36 Uhr
gee, and companies wonder why people would rather pirate then buy something outright. At least if you pirate you get the support you paid for. :)
B.Verlik schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 04:16 Uhr
That's exactly the way I felt when I first got my current computer, 1/2/03 . 2 months after getting my 1st computer ever, from my brother. (Now you have to understand, I was a complete newbie in every sense of the word.) I had ordered mine with a Pioneer A05 and it came with bundled software by Sonic MyDVD, which only allowed me to burn at the 'good' setting (not the better or best). The good setting was horrible and they would not answer any questions from people who received bundled software. (just the ol' upgrade for $99. offer) After 2 months of pulling my hair out, a rep from Pioneer suggested I try a Ulead 30 day trial. I've never looked back. And I've vowed to never, ever buy anything made by SONIC. (no relation to Sonic Foundry) And I never will.
TheHappyFriar schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 12:19 Uhr
Really? Last year I got an HP300i. It came with some crappy Arcsoft DVD software (well, it wasn't really crappy, but only allowed you to burn at their pre-set setting & would re-render all mpeg's to that bitrate). I could never get an answer from Arcsoft, so I got ahold of HP. They answered every question, fixed very problem. Infact, because of me, they put a patch file on their website for the Arcsoft software! :)

I was REALLY impressed by them!
ghost072 schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 23:04 Uhr
Sounds like you had a bad experience, and I agree that Cakewalk's handling of the situation - based on your side of the story - wasn't exactly stellar. However, I hardly think this one experience should encourage people to RUN from Cakewalk due to poor support. I have been a Twelve Tone Systems, now Cakewalk, customer for over a decade and I can tell you that I have had predominantly pleasant experiences with them. Not perfect; problems did arise, but they were responsive in every case, and the problem has always been resolved - which is more than I can say for countless other software companies.

Cakewalk trusts and values their customers, as evidenced by their using a simple serial number copy protection scheme, and they still think it important to include a nice paper manual (a nice thing with such a powerful and complicated program like Sonar). They also never charge for simple updates or bug fixes, unlike a lot of companies in the digital music field. And the owners of the company still respond to user issues and concerns in their forum and places like K-v-R.

You feel burned and now want to burn Cakewalk in any way that you can. Understandable in the heat of the moment, but misdirected, IMO, when there are so many companies more deserving of your spite.
ghost072 schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 23:14 Uhr
Forgot to mention: I own Sonar 3 and Vegas 4 and I can tell you that the Sonitus FX that came with Sonar do work in Vegas, but I'll have to test if automation works tonight and let you know...
ghost072 schrieb am 27.10.2004 um 23:42 Uhr
Hmm, also just noticed that your thread in Cakewalk's forum wasn't deleted at all, but moved to another forum (which isn't that surprising considering you posted it in the Sonar forum), a fact which was pointed out to you in the Cakewalk forum, as well.

You have to remember that Cakewalk did only recently purchase the Sonitus FX suite, (after Sonitus went out of business; without Cakewalk you would now own a defunct product), so I am sure they are still trying to figure out how to provide support and upgrade paths for it, but you seem to be hesitant to simply resolve your issue, for fear that Cakewalk is trying to screw over the entire Sonitus userbase.

Have you actually called Cakewalk's customer service line to deal with them directly? A user forum isn't really the place to resolve an issue like that - unless your goal is to smear the company instead of resolve your problem.
B.Verlik schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 00:08 Uhr
I think the real issue is we're tired of buying equipment that doesn't work and then watching days go by while the manufacturers shrug their shoulders. Or worse, don't even bother shrugging their shoulders. They should answer right away and admit that there's a problem and that they're working on it. That would at least pacify me for a little while.
PS: Arcsoft was part of my software package that came with my computer and I never got an answer from them either. Same problem as Happyfriar, except my computer was custom built and I had nobody else to call. (No more Arcsoft either.)
L25 schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 00:52 Uhr
The Sonar 3 to Sonar 4 upgrade seemed to happen over a very short time. The perception being that they were looking formore money, Just MHO.
TheHappyFriar schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 02:01 Uhr
was it the "can't burn to DVD because there's no DVD burner" message? :)

HP posted a link on their site for the fixed DLL file (don't get me wrong, I like some of the features of arcsoft and wish they were in tmpgenc, but the encoding at 6mbs no matter what annoys me)
B.Verlik schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 02:47 Uhr
To be honest, I don't remember anymore. I was 2 1/2 months into using computers and had no help from anywhere. The Arcsoft looked like the easiest of the 3 video editing programs (all in bundled packages), and it did seem that way, but it was just not that great a quality and that's all I can remember. I then tried Windows movie maker and that was pretty poor, but both of those programs we're fairly easy to figure out. I also had Ulead Movie studio 5 and that worked fine, but I could hardly understand how to use it or understand the instructions at that time. But when I finally tried to burn a DVD of anything that I could transfer to the Ulead program, that was when I discovered that Sonic's MyDVD wouldn't let me do anything but their 'good' (worst) quality. Anyway, I have no interest in Arcsoft. I'm completely happy with Vegas + DVD and I likedTMPGEnc's mpg encoder and TMPGEnc's DVD authoring program. I didn't mind Ulead's program, although somehow the field order seemed to get switched around a lot. Being just at the 2 year mark since starting to use a computer, I still have a lot to learn from what I have now. Arcsoft and MyDVD have both left a bad taste. I do use Windows movie maker from time to time to send video E-mails, but that's it. I'm probably learning more sophisticated stuff by coming to this forum, but a lot of the time, the brief descriptions still leave me wondering what somebody was talking about. I imagine in about a year, my posts will be one or two sentences long.
Kered schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 03:58 Uhr
Hi Rednroll,

I've dealt with Cakewalk tech support over email before, and while they sometimes don't respone for a couple of days, I have always gotten a response, so I'm sorry to hear about your bad experience. Having worked in tech support in the past, I can definitely attest to how you can't give great service to all customers 100% of the time. Sometimes it's the fault of the vendor, other times it's the fault of the customer. Not knowing the full history of your posts over at the Cakewalk forums, I can't say if you overreacted, but Cakewalk definitely is an above-average company, and I'd suggest giving them another shot after you've cooled down a bit. I have to agree with ghost072, too... one bad experience with Cakewalk does not mean you should encourage all people to stay away from them.

And for what it's worth, I have the old version of the Sonitus plugins that are still labeled as Ultrafunk and not Cakewalk (they must have changed it for Sonar 4, I got them bundled with Sonar 3), and I can automate them (in Sonar). Are you sure yours aren't automatable? Maybe Acid or Vegas has trouble with the automation features? I'll have to try automating them in Acid later.

-Kered
Rednroll schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 14:07 Uhr
"They should answer right away and admit that there's a problem and that they're working on it. That would at least pacify me for a little while."

Exactly Steve, and this is what I've become acustomed to when working with Sony/Sonic Foundry throughout the years. They Acknowledge the problem and say they're looking into addressing it. Cakewalk offered me a personal solution, but does that address the problem in any way for anyone else with the similar circumstance? I like to know when I purchase a product from a company and there's a problem, then everyone is going to get treated the same. I would be pissed to find out later that I repurchased the Sonitus plugin suite for an additional $299, while user Rednroll who knocked on their door a little harder got the same thing for $49. I even feel screwed right now with the $49 deal because Sonar 3.0 PE users where given a FREE PATCH to upgrade their Sonitus plugins. Well what about anyone else that purchased the plugins directly from Cakewalk's site when they where still titled Ultrafunk, or what about us Ultrfunk users? Well if you goto Cakewalk's site and discover there's no upgrade option then you have to pay the $299, but if you raise hell in their forums like I did then you can get them for $49. I feel like I'm dealing with some flea market vendor in Jamaica when I'm doing business with Cakewalk. The price is negotiable as long as you can convince me to change it. That's not how you run a respectable business.

Other than one non attentive support reply from there tech support, there sales support has been good. But IMO they are handling the matter all wrong.
ghost072 schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 15:45 Uhr
"They should answer right away and admit that there's a problem and that they're working on it. That would at least pacify me for a little while."

I agree that what you describe is the best case scenario for end users, but your situation, as I read it, is a bit different from Rednrolls. Cakewalk purchased a defunct product (as Ultrafunk had actually closed their doors) and is now charged with providing support for it. Since, Rednroll purchased his software through Ultrafunk, he probably isn't legally granted the same kind of automatic support that he would if Ultrafunk were still in business. That isn't to say that Cakewalk wants to lose Rednroll as a future customer (I am sure they don't), but it does complicate the situation, especially since Cakewalk only offers their updates to registered *Cakewalk* customers - which Rednroll is not.

A compromise would seem to be in order, something along the lines of granting Rednroll and other Ultrafunk customers a special serial number or something, but these things take time to implement and Cakewalk DID offer a temporary solution to Rednroll. The problem, it seems to me, is that he has taken it upon himself to stand up for all the unspoken masses of Ultrafunk users, instead of simply dealing with his issue personally with Cakewalk.
ghost072 schrieb am 28.10.2004 um 15:49 Uhr
It did happen fairly quickly, but the features added to version 4 are more than worth the price to upgrade, IMO. One button track freeze, improved video scoring, surround mixing, a new synth and awesome new workflow improvements (track folders, masterview track) have me salivating to upgrade. The upgrade is actually fairly similar in scope to Vegas 4 to 5, IMO. Some people don't have any interest in the new features, but for those that do, the upgrade is viewed as essential.
Rednroll schrieb am 29.10.2004 um 20:42 Uhr
After some kicking and screaming Cakewalk has come forth and has put the issue to rest and are looking into further correcting it.

From Cakewalk:
"Hello Brian,

We are considering changes in how we present the Sonitus:fx upgrade offer.

I can see why you drew the flea market vendor analogy, our handling seemed fairly secretive depending on your point of view.

Here’s how the offer was presented: We directly emailed all registered Sonitus plug-in owners and offered an upgrade to the latest plug-in suite for $49. The email offer was sent twice. As you stated earlier, you bought a retail version of the Sonitus suite but never registered them. Since you weren’t in our list of registered customers, it wasn’t possible to notify you.

We are looking at raising the visibility of this offer. Doing so requires some time and planning, but we’ll keep everyone up to date.

For now the solution remains:
1) Register your plug-ins here http://www.cakewalk.com/Register/default.asp
2) Then call 888-Cakewalk to place an upgrade order for $49. (or 617-423-9004)

I hope that points everyone in the right direction.

Adam Burch
Director of Service & Support
Cakewalk "