I got one of those nifty 16:9 aspect ratio adapters from Century Optics to go on my nifty Sony VX2000.
It projects a "squished" 16:9 aspect ratio image onto the 4:3 CCD, so when the tape is played back on a 16:9 TV, it should look great. Right?
Well, I don't have a 16:9 TV, and I love the expanse of 16:9 for my travel-oriented video packages, so I used Vegas Video 2.0 to letterbox the image.
I used track motion and the 16:9 template to get it to look right, but upon render the image quality is dreadful. It's got blocky artifacts and a really soft look to it. I have tried this with Resampling on and off, and I have tried it with "Do not letterbox" on and off. It all comes out pretty much the same.
I am hopeful that I am missing something subtle (or obvious) for that matter. It just doesn't make sense to me that this would not work. Anybody else using this adapter or have any hints to provide? I am hopeful that VV3.0 might also handle this better, but I have not tried it yet.
Thanks very much for any help.
Will
It projects a "squished" 16:9 aspect ratio image onto the 4:3 CCD, so when the tape is played back on a 16:9 TV, it should look great. Right?
Well, I don't have a 16:9 TV, and I love the expanse of 16:9 for my travel-oriented video packages, so I used Vegas Video 2.0 to letterbox the image.
I used track motion and the 16:9 template to get it to look right, but upon render the image quality is dreadful. It's got blocky artifacts and a really soft look to it. I have tried this with Resampling on and off, and I have tried it with "Do not letterbox" on and off. It all comes out pretty much the same.
I am hopeful that I am missing something subtle (or obvious) for that matter. It just doesn't make sense to me that this would not work. Anybody else using this adapter or have any hints to provide? I am hopeful that VV3.0 might also handle this better, but I have not tried it yet.
Thanks very much for any help.
Will