Johan:

Nice try, but at $500, you are still a long way from king of all
suckers. That title belongs to Joe Doria.
While I understand your reasons for paying $500 seem logical to YOU, I
can't think of it as a smart decision. Most of the time it is just
good old-fashioned "impulse-buying". But that is your right and I
respect that.
As far as my "arrogance", let me remind you that the object of this
forum is not to get guys to like each other. For that, you can go to
your local gay bar. I'm not into that; I'm into expressing my views in
a direct way, and you may or may not like me for it. That is YOUR
problem.


Victor.



Johan Althoff wrote:
>>I paid $500 for Vegas Pro, with both eyes open. I paid it since I
>>needed it fast, and had no time to wait for my local dealer to order
>>a hard package. I ordered Vegas Pro online, directly from Sonic
>>Foundry, since I was in a hurry.
>>
>>I will now do exactly the same with the Vegas Video upgrade, since I
>>need it ASAP and have no problem with paying extra money for the
>>service of getting started within 10 minutes of my order placement.
I
>>don't need printed manuals, I don't need a hard package, I don't
need
>>flashy ad leaflets or registration cards. I need software.
>>
>>The arrogance of your posts never cease to amaze me. How could a
>>person fail in credibility just because he payed $600 for Vegas? At
>>least he bought the software, unlike certain other disturbing
>>elements in this forum.
>>
>>Victor Harriman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Joe:
>>>>The difference between you and me is that I DON'T have a
>>>>beef with SonicFoundry. You do.
>>>>Now, if my arguing seems condescending to you, then you
>>>>should just ignore my posts.
>>>>
>>>>Your opinions can't be taken too seriously. After all,
>>>>aren't you the famous "$600.00 man" in Irvin Gomez's posts?
>>>>A sucker like you (the only person EVER to pay $600 for
>>>>VegasPro!!!) can't expect others to follow his advice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Victor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Joe Doria wrote:
>>>>>>Hey Victor,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I understand you're right to posting your opinions
>>>>here....but everytime I read something from you
>>>>lately....you're always arguing in a condescending way.
>>>>Slamming others here seems to be your main goal.
>>>>Now I may have small a beef with SF in general (believe all
>>>>Vegas audio updates should be just that...an free update),
>>>>but I don't attack others here with it. I speak directly to
>>>>them moderaors like a man and that is that.
>>>>>>Personally, I feel your debates belong in a "general
>>>>audio" forum...as all apps have their pitfalls.
>>>>>>Why don't you direct your "Vegas cons" agruments towards
>>>>them and see how you fare?
>>>>They may help you or boot you...one of the two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>JoeD
>>>>