Adding another hard drive or two

GeoffEdwards wrote on 2/24/2012, 9:32 AM
Hi

I have Vegas Pro 10 running on a Dell 490 workstation running windows 7 64 bit. I have three HDs two 1 terabyte and a 250gb system drive. My photographic and MS Office software is on on another PC.

I am capturing DV and have a lot of footage. I think that a NAS would be a good way to expand my storage, except that I can't afford one yet. I am wondering whether, at least for the time being, I could use hard drives on other PCs on my network, it is a gigabit setup, to store and access captured footage smoothly?

Thanks

Geoff

Comments

UlfLaursen wrote on 2/24/2012, 10:17 AM
I have tried to edit SD (DV) footage over network, but it was not very smooth.

I would suggest that you might get an e-SATA card in your Dell, and then get a big external drive, 1-3 TB external drive.

Ulf
Ros wrote on 2/24/2012, 10:40 AM
I have been using 2 of these (4 Bay SATA to eSATA) for several years with Vegas and it has been 100% reliable:

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132029

You might want to check different models and they do have some that are usb 3.0

Rob
Chienworks wrote on 2/24/2012, 10:48 AM
I have captured to drives across a network with success, even with only a 100Mbps network, but i've also had it be less successful. If i need the external capture space what i do is capture to a local drive first, then move the captured files to the other PC afterward.
GeoffEdwards wrote on 2/24/2012, 11:58 AM
Hi Ulf

Thanks I was planning to use a standard format hard drive that could be added to a NAS at a later date.

Geoff
GeoffEdwards wrote on 2/24/2012, 11:59 AM
Thanks Rob

GeoffEdwards wrote on 2/24/2012, 12:04 PM
Thanks Chienworks

I think I am planning to do the same. Capture the DV to a local disk and then move it to another disk on a networked PC. I would then need to use that networked PC as the place where Vegas needs to go to work on a project.

Geoff
Steve Mann wrote on 2/24/2012, 8:38 PM
I have a dozen hard-disks on my desktop. Well, mostly in a desk drawer. I put each project on a separate hard disk that goes into a USB 2.0 hard disk drive docking station. Do all of my editing and project work on it. I also back up the hard disk to another USB 2.0 dock. I work in HDV and USB 2.0 is fast enough. The downside to USB 2 is that the backups can take a while. I have another workstation with USB 3 and an external USB 3 dock. Except for backup time, I really don't see any difference.
ushere wrote on 2/24/2012, 8:59 PM
same as steve,,,,

@steve - really, you don't see any major advantage to usb3? i was wondering about shuffling video files between desktop and external drives. at present usb2 works fine, but can get painful shift large m2t's backwards and forwards....
Steve Mann wrote on 2/24/2012, 9:47 PM
I said, "except for backup time". I see no difference in the editing performance.
xberk wrote on 2/24/2012, 10:56 PM
I use extra "bare" SATA hard drives. Mostly 1TB or larger with an Antec drive caddy that costs about $20 and was easy to install. They act exactly like the drive is installed internally -- because it actually is .. So editing performance is the same but it's easy to remove the drive and put in a different one. They can be set up to be hot swappable.

Antec Drive Caddy

Paul B .. PCI Express Video Card: EVGA VCX 10G-P5-3885-KL GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 ULTRA ,,  Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor ,,  MSI Z590-A PRO Desktop Motherboard LGA-1200 ,, 64GB (2X32GB) XPG GAMMIX D45 DDR4 3200MHz 288-Pin SDRAM PC4-25600 Memory .. Seasonic Power Supply SSR-1000FX Focus Plus 1000W ,, Arctic Liquid Freezer II – 360MM .. Fractal Design case ,, Samsung Solid State Drive MZ-V8P1T0B/AM 980 PRO 1TB PCI Express 4 NVMe M.2 ,, Wundiws 10 .. Vegas Pro 19 Edit

ushere wrote on 2/24/2012, 11:23 PM
ops - i thought you meant drive imaging backup....

so how much faster are they? would i notice a 'significant' difference say shifting 20 4gb files?

if i go usb3 it means i'll have to get a usb3 card for my mb. about $30, so that's no big deal, unless together with the cost of drives i'm NOT going to see any major change.....

videoITguy wrote on 2/24/2012, 11:48 PM
For those weighing USB2 versus USB3 on docking drives to your system. I have found it depends. USB2 performance is particularly dependent on CPU cycles - so if your system is already struggling USB2 can really slow down and can even cause corruption and choke on very large file transfers.

USB3 design seems to be less prone to this vulnerability and generally it will be very noticeably faster than any USB2 performance.
But forewarning here, USB3 connection is best implemented in the motherboard chip set...add-on cards will very widely in perfomance dependent on where they have to be slotted.
Steve Mann wrote on 2/25/2012, 8:32 AM
Add on USB3 cards don't give you any performance increase because they are limited by the PCI bus speed of 133 MHz.