Athlon64 on Windows XP 64 bit OS Media Encoding performance

shogo wrote on 2/9/2004, 8:07 PM
Was checking out Anandtech's review of the Public beta for Windows XP 64 and found these results very promising
considering this is an early beta and drivers are no where near complete. The media encoding performance was up by 15% which is quite amazing considering it was a 32 bit encoding and un-optimized for 64 bit execution. If you look down a little further you see that the gaming benchmarks are a disappointment but games are very dependant on video drivers. The video drivers they used were 4 months old, so I expect within several months it will be on par or outdo 32 bit XP.

This boads well for the 64 bit argument in my mind, I am no AMD fan-boy considering I have a p4 3 Ghz , a dual Xeon 3ghz and a laptop with a P4 3Ghz. I really am hoping AMD does well to keep Intel in check and Intel seems to think it can dictate to the market when and when not it needs things .ie 64 bit computing "the market has no need for it yet"
and the Rambus debacle where it tried to cause everybody to change memory standards. I like inovation and AMD keeps intel on their toes!

Now Intel is set to announce a 64 bit CPU
when clearly 6 months ago it had no intention of releasing a desktop 64bit processor. Because that would essentially kill off the Itanium that they are trying to get big tin buyers to buy into which they are not having much luck with since it has to run 32bit apps
in immulation mode.

Go little AMD.

Comments

Native wrote on 2/9/2004, 8:22 PM
Im lost, as soon as rendering is about to complete, my PC shuts down completely and i have to wait long before pwoering up.
Everything is ok execpt rendering.
Pls, help.
shogo wrote on 2/9/2004, 8:28 PM
Think you posted on the wrong subject ;-)
ibliss wrote on 2/9/2004, 8:49 PM
Well, if anyone is interested, I have already tried out the public preview of Windows XP 64-bit edition.

The good new is that Vegas 4d ran perfectly in the brief period I tested it.

The "bad" news is that the rendertest times (using the 'official' rendertest veg file from the Sundance site) were identical to running under the 32-bit XP. But hey, it wasn't any slower.

Roll on 64-bit everything I say! :)
TheHappyFriar wrote on 2/9/2004, 9:04 PM
I'm waiting for Doom 3 to be released this year. Then. THEN i'm upgrading to an AMD Opeteron. :) Or, if I can't afford that, a great AMD 64. :) It's about time PC's go 64-bit! yeah! :)
shogo wrote on 2/9/2004, 9:55 PM
I think once things get optimized for it will really rock. If Sun and IBM are using it for some enterprise stuff then there must be a very good reason for it. IBM has ported DB2 and Sun has ported Solaris as well their new Java technology and have had really good results. Their not going to do this just to piss Intel off, why risk enterprise class customers unless the technology really has something to offer. Again Intel will get on the boat or get left behind not that I think it will happen, they have a market value of around $40 billion dollars their R&D department alone probably has more money than AMD.

It's just good that AMD will make 64bit computing a reality for us sooner than when Intel decides it's good for us. Does anybody think we would be using 3.2 Ghz Processors if AMD hadn't been successful with the Athlon CPU back in 99. I use Intel CPU's because I am doing video editing and right now they are the fastest for the work I do but if I were gaming like I used too I would be typing this on an AMD box.

Anyways let me get off my soap box and get back to work ;-)