Authoring 30p SD DVDs from 1080i cameras.

Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 12:33 PM
Since with my HVR-A1 camera, I can output good quality SD resolution video in several formats, I've been really tempted to change my SD DVD output from 60i anamorphic to 30p anamorphic. Here are the reasons why:

1/ It will look better played back on a PC, especially scaled to different resolutions.

2/ It will look better played back on 1280x720 HDTV

3/ It will probably look better an a regular 4:3 CRT TV as there might be less damage done by deinterlacing and dropping every 4th line.

4/ If I capture and convert to 1280x720 30p with Cineform 3.03, I'll save a lot of hard disk space and my CPU and external firewire hard drives will have a much easier time with realtime previews while editing.

5/ My aging 3.06 P4 struggles with 1080 60i, but absolutely flies with 720 30p. Converting to this format on capture would put off me needing to upgrade my setup for now (which I can't afford to do anyway).

Here's what I don't know:

1/ Should I make up a new 30p widescreen mpeg2 template or just use the standard 60i widescreen DVD Architect template?

2/ Do DVD players even look for a 30p mpeg flag, and if they do do they treat the footage any differently than they do 60i?

3/ Will the uprezzing algorythms in many HDTVs and upconverting DVD players recognize and upconvert a 30p SD DVD?

Here are disadvantages to going the 30p route:

1/ Shaky camera work looks worse.

2/ I'll have to slow down my pans and zooms.

3/ Integrating standard DV footage will look worse.

4/ I'll have to recapture or reconvert scenes I want to use slow motion differently before slowing down the action in Vegas.

Any insight to this approach or corrections on my points would be welcomed.

Comments

Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 2:12 PM
Another disadvantage of 30p SD DVD's is they might look jerkier on NTSC compatible PAL DVD players.
David Jimerson wrote on 6/23/2006, 2:39 PM
NTSC DVD doesn't support 30p. But that's OK, because converting it to 60i is easy as weezy. It'll look just like 30p when played.
Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 2:51 PM
Yeah but will it uprez on an upconverting DVD player or HDTV with an upconvertor or one of the new Toshiba HD-DVD players or the current Samsung BlueRay player?
David Jimerson wrote on 6/23/2006, 7:19 PM
I don't see why not, depending on the specifics of the player.
Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 10:14 PM
The reason it wouldn't would be because it would think the 30p was 60i and apply a blend fields or interpolate deinterlace, reducing the resolution, and not even try to uprez. It certainly is possible to uprez 30p, but it is an uncommon format and I suspect that manufactures don't have to demand to accomodate it. I don't know for sure though. Somebody must. Usually there are all kinds of experts around here.
Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 10:53 PM
OK, the closest thing I can find to an answer about how different DVD players handle 30p video is here:

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_7_4/dvd-benchmark-part-5-progressive-10-2000.html

Going down a ways, there is specific discussion of 30p and 2-2 pulldown. Going further into the article gives more information including how specific players hand deinterlacing with both 3-2 and 2-2 pulldown. It seems that some players handle 30p quite well while others fail miserably. Anyway, after quite a bit of searching, that link has the best information I've found so far.
Laurence wrote on 6/23/2006, 11:09 PM
On this page, you can look up how well a given DVD player handles different types of material, including 2-2 pulldown removal. There is reference there to 2-2 pulldown flags. Is it possible to set a 2-2 pulldown flag with Vegas and DVD Architect? Does taking the default 60i Widescreen DVD Architect template and changing the video mode tab from interlaced to progressive set the 2-2 pulldown flag that some DVD players will recognize?

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/cgi-bin/shootout.cgi
Laurence wrote on 6/24/2006, 12:18 AM
Well I've started running tests and have answered at least one of my questions:

No I cannont set a 30p 2-2 pulldown flag with Vegas and burn it to DVD with DVD Architect. If I try DVD Architect wants to re-render the 30p mpeg as 60i. Is there another DVD authoring program that will let me do this?

Also, I suspect that Vegas 7 / DVD Architect 4 is just around the corner. This would be a welcomed fix: being able to set a 30p 2-2 pulldown flag with appropriate templates to take out the guesswork.
Laurence wrote on 6/24/2006, 12:30 AM
OK a little more research and I found the following: that some DVD players (usually high end ones with line doublers) get confused by 30p DVDs with the progressive flag set. What happens is that when these DVD players see a progessive scan flag, they automatically assume that the footage is 24p and start using a 3-2 pulldown removal which of course looks terrible on 30p 2-2 pulldown footage. As a result, it is extremely likely that DVD Architect will not allow 30p with a progressive scan flag because it is better to avoid this situation entirely by just letting the DVD player think the footage is interlaced.
David Jimerson wrote on 6/24/2006, 8:09 AM
If the DVD player blended fields, it would put together two fields which comprise a whole 30p frame. There would be no resolution loss. At least there would be no FURTHER resolution loss; when you've converted 60i to 30p, you've already lost resolution (leaving aside the downrez to DVD from HD).

But you're talking about something other than uprezzing to HD here:


"OK a little more research and I found the following: that some DVD players (usually high end ones with line doublers) get confused by 30p DVDs with the progressive flag set. What happens is that when these DVD players see a progessive scan flag, they automatically assume that the footage is 24p and start using a 3-2 pulldown removal which of course looks terrible on 30p 2-2 pulldown footage. As a result, it is extremely likely that DVD Architect will not allow 30p with a progressive scan flag because it is better to avoid this situation entirely by just letting the DVD player think the footage is interlaced."

That's what I said before -- DVD does not support 30p. Only 24p and 60i. And watching 30p in a 60i stream will still look like 30p, just like watching 24p with pulldown still looks like 24p.

In any case, you can't set DVD Architect with "progressive flags" with 60i or 30p material. You can make a 24p DVD, which will require a 24p file (either rendered from Vegas, or DVDA will do it when it authors), or you can make a 60i DVD.

If you were to drop a 30p file in a 24p DVDA project, and DVDA converted the file to 24p, it would look terrible, because 30p does not convert to 24p well at all. But that doesn't have anything to do with "progressive flags"; it has everything to do with there not being enough temporal imformation in 30p footage to make a good conversion to 24p.
Laurence wrote on 6/24/2006, 8:59 AM
Well the deinterlace step happens before the uprez step. If you lose resolution on the deinterlace, that negatively effects the uprez. If you have a 30p piece that is flagged as 60i and the DVD player doesn't uprez 60i, that is going to effect whether or not an attempt at uprezzing is even made.
David Jimerson wrote on 6/24/2006, 9:48 AM
If you're creating a 30p file, then you have to deinterlace before you go to DVD, so you've lost resolution before you ever get out of Vegas. Then, on DVD, it will be encoded as 60i, splitting each 30p frame into two 60i fields. There's no way around this; there are no "flags"; it's just a 60i file.

When (if) the DVD player deinterlaces, if it blends fields, it will put the 30p frames back together.

But like I said, it depends on the specifics of what the player does to uprez. If it does uprez 60i, then you're fine. If it doesn't, then you're not. But in either case, it doesn't matter if you converted your 60i footage to 30p or not; you're still bound by the rules of 60i in terms of how the player handles it.

Laurence wrote on 6/24/2006, 11:00 AM
Well if you start from a1080i video, you have plenty of resolution to give you full 720x480 at 60i, 30p or 24p. I can go to any of these formats at SD resolution without compromising resolution at all. That is the point of doing it this way instead of just letting the player handle it.

I've been running all kinds of tests and have found the following:

1/ If I render a 30p DVD and play it from WinDVD or PowerDVD, I get an image that has noticably better vertical resolution. Diagonal lines like roof edges don't noticably staircase like they do at 60i.

2/ This is not the case on my CRT TV (which has a compress mode for true widescreen). On that TV, both versions look equally sharp, but the 60i version is smoother.

3/ 24p is something I'm going to give up on until I want to make a commitment into dolly tracks, solid tripods with fluid heads, and some sort of a steadycam. Otherwise the lack of temporal fluidity just drives me nuts.

This leads me to believe that 60i looks better on TVs that can handle 60i, but that 30p would be noticably sharper on any playback device doing 30p like computers or the current crop of 1280x720 LCD and lower budget plasma TVs.
Laurence wrote on 6/24/2006, 12:34 PM
I found the following posted on another forum. It talks about exactly what I'm running into with 30p delivery:

_____________________________________________________________


I don't think the JVC footage (from my HD1) downcoverts very well to NTSC DVD video because of the 30fps progressive 2:2 cadence results in excessive moire for many (U.S. mainly) DVD players.

The problem is not the 30fps progressive with 2:2 cadence format per se, but the fact that proper support for it in U.S. spec DVD players is so spotty. Players using the Faroudja deinterlacing chips in AUTO-2 mode, or Silicone Image chips will do fine, but among the others, it's hit and miss. Yes...the DVDs play, but when the player doesn't adapt to the 2:2 cadence or flags, the video displays excessive moire.

It's not a problem for PAL countries where progressive 2:2 cadence is common, and supported.

DVDs I make look fantastic on my DVD player (Faroudja), but borderline unsatisfactory on other players. It really does depend on the player itself. And since you don't know in advance which player your DVDs for distribution will be played on, you can't be certain that it will look its intended best on every showing.