Be Honest, is V5 worth getting if you're happy w/ Vegas4?

ken c wrote on 8/18/2004, 9:59 AM
Ok I'm still on Vegas 4, after reading all the comments here this past couple of weeks I don't think I'll go for Vegas 5... since V4 works great, and I don't need the new features in V5.

Knowing what you all know now, is it Really worth upgrading to V5, or, would you wait til Vegas 6 or whatever new version of 5 comes out, before upgrading?

If Vegas 4 had a lot of bugs that Vegas 5 Fixed, then I'd see upgrading. But so far, I just hear a lot of problems w/Vegas 5, so I'm not too excited about getting it just to have it + pay up + possibly have a buggy video workstation as a result. The DVDA2 looks good, possibly worth getting that, but not V5. That's my candid take on it. Whats' your ideas..?

eg Vegas 4 works great on my P4 win2k system, no glitches or complaints at all ... I'm not seeing any compelling reason to upgrade... what would you do?



thanks much ..

Ken

Comments

FuTz wrote on 8/18/2004, 10:07 AM

If you are really happy with ANY program you got, why change?

Some people did the move to get all these audio improvements they made in V5, some to get the 3D and bezier masking options.
Basically, if what you make is cuts and crossfades (ie if you work in a very "traditional" way), you don't necessarily "need" V5.

Personnaly, I shifted to get DVDA and bezier mask at a reasonable price. DVDA meets my expectations and I haven't had a problem with V5 so far so basically, I'm satisfied.
usman152008 wrote on 8/18/2004, 10:07 AM
I think it all depends on what features are u looking for. Me, i haven't used Vegas 4, In fact i just started using trial version of Vegas 5. So i dont really have any idea if vegas 4 is better than 5. I would say that a newer version always has new features, so if it was me i would go with 5.
db wrote on 8/18/2004, 10:09 AM
if you are not to use the NEW features of V5 - V4 is working for you so why upgrade ..
.. the main new feature i use is NRS and for my use that was worth the upgrade and on top of that was all the new features in DVDA2 which i do use all the time came along with the it ... all comes down to are YOU going to get your $$ worth using new features ...
johnmeyer wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:03 AM
Go over the new features list, and if none of them excite you, then stay with V4.

Sometimes, however, new versions make changes in the interface that don't necessarily show up in the features list, but which make a big improvement in productivity. Unfortunately, this was not the case with Vegas 5. All the craziness with the interaction between selection of events, track selection, timeline selection, and ripple is still there. Same with trying to find those tiny fader controls in each event when you want to do a simple fade to black (and heaven help you if you nudge the invisible opacity control at the top of the event).

I am very frustrated these days because I just completed several projects that should have been done in fifteen minutes but each took several hours, all due to quirks in the interface. I have been using this program for almost three years (longer if you consider my VideoFactory experience). Vegas is frustratingly close to being an amazingly productive interface, but in Vegas 5, Sony decided not to address the user interface issues and instead added features not related to workflow, productivity, or ease of use. Hopefully they will put this on their list for V5 (or for an interim release).
baysidebas wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:23 AM
And the eternal question is: will the publisher allow future upgrades that skip a major version release? e.g. from V4 to V6? Or will you be stuck with paying full price for V6? That is certainly a consideration when deciding whether to wait.
planders wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:41 AM
They've always allowed you to upgrade from any version in the past, I think it would be quite unlikely for them to change that policy now. Besides, as they try to build Vegas' acceptance, any sale is a good sale.

As for interface quirks, I have never, ever, managed to screw up with the opacity and fade handles. Their locations make perfect sense, and require you to be in precise yet accessible locations. To accidentally adjust any of them would require some pretty careless mouse handling... :)
BrianStanding wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:52 AM
Actually, one interface improvement that HAS made a huge improvement in my workflow is that V5 lets you remap the keyboard shortcuts to your liking.

See this thread for more detail on how this feature has helped me:

johnmeyer wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:54 AM
I agree, the remap keyboard is a great improvement.
David_Kuznicki wrote on 8/18/2004, 11:59 AM
I'm one of the people that did not upgrade from 4 to 5... there wasn't a ''must have' feature like there was in my previous upgrade (from 2.0 to 4.0). The masks didn't do much for me, as I abuse After Effects on a daily basis. Until I buy a control surface (I just don't have the money for a HUI at the moment!), I can't justify the upgrade to myself. I suppose that, without having AE, it might be a more exciting upgrade.

I've never had any problems upgrading from previous versions, and hell, I can't WAIT for Acid 5.0. I'm still using Acid Pro 2.0 & Music 3.0 right now-- THAT is going to seem like an evolutionary upgrade!

David.

PigsDad wrote on 8/18/2004, 12:49 PM
So I upgraded when it first came out, and have done a couple of medium-sized projects with v5. In looking back, I don't think I have really benefited from the new version of Vegas much, but the new DVDA has been more than worth the upgrade to me. If I had to do it over, I probably would upgrade again.

Just one man's opinion.
DGrob wrote on 8/18/2004, 1:18 PM
Bezier masks are a great asset. Nested Tracks can be amazing. 3D track motion is tremendous. I'm working the tutorials and getting better (faster) all the time. I've really enjoyed V5 (after VF, V3 and V4). Darryl
winrockpost wrote on 8/18/2004, 3:03 PM
Vegas 5 to me ,is not as stable as 4, media bins is worse if anything than 4, 3d stuff is ok but if you use a good 3d program I would say you will still be using it. Track motion presets still missing., I get some strange computer hangs I never experienced in 2,3,or 4.
My opinion is they rushed 5 to be out at NAB and have still not recovered.
busterkeaton wrote on 8/18/2004, 3:25 PM
Vegas 5 does have more quirky little bugs, no showstoppers for me so far. For video DVD-A is the really big upgrade, so if you use that for DVDs then absolutely. The other video upgrades you have to decide if you will use 3d and bezier masks. There was a ton of audio improvements too. Automation is nice as are the 5.1 changes.
johnmeyer wrote on 8/19/2004, 10:28 AM
busterkeaton's last post really hits the nail on the head.
David_AJ wrote on 8/19/2004, 10:37 AM
I upgraded to V5, primarily for one reason: The ability to save subclips in the media bins. I am working on a 45-minute documentary and must boil down from over 20 hours of tape. Being able to organize according to selected sub-sections of an event is priceless to me.
Denicio wrote on 8/19/2004, 11:12 AM
Oh My! The ability to use my Mackie Control was reason enough for me!!!!!
I use it for my Recording stuido and it works with Nuendo fantastically, but in V4 it was just eye candy...it had no value. NOW the Vegas implemetation of the Mackie Control is BETTER than the Nuendo implementation.

Kudos to Sony for this !

There are some subtle improvements that also make it worth while.
Not to mention the new Excalibur comes out tomorrow and its ONLY for V5.

Brock Landers
aka Dirk Diggler
BrianStanding wrote on 8/19/2004, 11:53 AM
Oh, man, how could I forget subclips?!!! I've only been yelling on this forum for subclips for the last two years!

Subclips alone worth the upgrade. I'll also second the comments on the improvements to DVDA2 -- all the major gaps in DVDA1 have been filled, and new features like Vegas-compatible subtitling have been added. In my view, DVDA has rocketed from an interesting, quirky application in version 1 to the top of the heap in Version 2.
ken c wrote on 8/19/2004, 12:12 PM
Thanks all, sounds like a good dialogue ... I think since V4 works great for me I'll stick with it... but I may get v6 if it has a lot of new features + interface upgrades etc.. great thread!

ken
busterkeaton wrote on 8/19/2004, 3:13 PM
Yes, if you own a Mackie, then by all means upgrade.

Also while we are talking about the features aimed at the Power users, if you have a Dual Processor box or a Gigabet network, then network rendering is sweet too.
JJKizak wrote on 8/19/2004, 5:04 PM
I think its worth the upgrade just for DVD-A2. I haven't tried network rendering yet, nor dual processor rendering yet, nor 3d b whatever masks yet, Mackie control yet, and a whole bunch of other things that I already forgot about.

JJK
swarrine wrote on 8/19/2004, 7:38 PM
Still on V4 here.
tailgait wrote on 8/19/2004, 11:17 PM
I have had nothing but trouble with V5. First, it crashes my Sony Vaio where V4 never crashed it. It hangs up and I have to pull the plug to get the splash screen off. Terrible to have to do that. This occurs after I have done a long editing job on it. V4 never did that. Also little things go haywaire. Like Ctl-Z does NOT remove a media track which has just been entered on the timeline. The drop-down screen on the capture screen has only a "delete all" button whereas on V4 you could delete one or two of you captured files without having to delete all. The icons of the captured files do not show in the bin below the capture window as they did in V4. I was told to switch to the V4 vidcap....well...why have V5. I am sorry I ever booted it up on my computer.
Burt