XP OS and VP8.c and am working with both SD and HDV (Canon HV30) footage.
Subject of video: Presentation of landscaping issues of a Housing Authority property hence all footage of plants and all outside (none of my usual artsy stuff).
While I have made, submitted and had no problems with a video seen as a wmv as email attachments (technically "online" viewing so to speak) -- and that will be the first phase of its delivery, this time I have to consider that there may be a need for it to be viewed in a City Council meeting setting, i.e. on some monitor in the room.
This last step may not occur but I want to be sure that what I create would not run into glitches -- either by my making a DVD copy if/when needed (I've never made a DVD), or via conversion of the full resolution wmv that I could send them by some Council staff to be viewable on said monitor.
I say "full resolution version" because the first phase version of the video would have to be relatively small, i.e. maximum 512 x 288 or so as not to be a huge email attachment.
Yes, I've thought of posting it at Vimeo, YouTube or Facebook or even hosting at my website but such a public platform could be interpreted as somewhat of an "exposing government" threat to it that I do not want to inject into to it. This about an issue, not an attack ad.
I've been experimenting with various Project Properties but I'm getting a bit confused as what to choose, specifically in terms of pixel aspect ratio and field order in order for this to have said "Council" room viewing compatibility.
I know that most non-DVD platforms, i.e. Windows Media Player can only play 1.0 pixel ratio footage and I usually choose progressive since all my content so far has been for online/as email attachment viewing. Therefore I usually have both of those settings as Project Properties so I don't run into 1.0 > 1.33, etc. problems on final output.
So with the above information in mind and since this in not meant to be a cherished wedding memory or a Spielberg production:
1.
Thank you for your help.
~ Philip
Subject of video: Presentation of landscaping issues of a Housing Authority property hence all footage of plants and all outside (none of my usual artsy stuff).
While I have made, submitted and had no problems with a video seen as a wmv as email attachments (technically "online" viewing so to speak) -- and that will be the first phase of its delivery, this time I have to consider that there may be a need for it to be viewed in a City Council meeting setting, i.e. on some monitor in the room.
This last step may not occur but I want to be sure that what I create would not run into glitches -- either by my making a DVD copy if/when needed (I've never made a DVD), or via conversion of the full resolution wmv that I could send them by some Council staff to be viewable on said monitor.
I say "full resolution version" because the first phase version of the video would have to be relatively small, i.e. maximum 512 x 288 or so as not to be a huge email attachment.
Yes, I've thought of posting it at Vimeo, YouTube or Facebook or even hosting at my website but such a public platform could be interpreted as somewhat of an "exposing government" threat to it that I do not want to inject into to it. This about an issue, not an attack ad.
I've been experimenting with various Project Properties but I'm getting a bit confused as what to choose, specifically in terms of pixel aspect ratio and field order in order for this to have said "Council" room viewing compatibility.
I know that most non-DVD platforms, i.e. Windows Media Player can only play 1.0 pixel ratio footage and I usually choose progressive since all my content so far has been for online/as email attachment viewing. Therefore I usually have both of those settings as Project Properties so I don't run into 1.0 > 1.33, etc. problems on final output.
So with the above information in mind and since this in not meant to be a cherished wedding memory or a Spielberg production:
1.
Thank you for your help.
~ Philip