Blend Fade Video FX

Express wrote on 2/5/2004, 10:47 AM
I would like to take a scene and have it go from a heavy bump map to no bump map, or none to heavy (other effects too).

I have no struggle with keyframes, and doing this with B&W and some of the other filters, because they can be 'blended' to/from nothing.

Searched help and the forum, but so far I came up empty.

Is this possible?

How do I do it?

TIA

Comments

jetdv wrote on 2/5/2004, 11:16 AM
One way you could definitely do it is to render a section WITH and the simply dissolve it into a section without. Some effects don't keyframe well (I had problems with emboss like this) but the intermediate render will always work.
Express wrote on 2/5/2004, 1:05 PM
Thanks,

I'm glad to know that I'm not just missing a fundamental concept here.

If I understand you correctly:
-I split the scene at the boundaries of the effect.
-Render a copy of that scene with the effects in place.
-Put them both on the timeline and dissolve between them

Is there a 'best' way to syncronize these two clips, so that the overlap does not have any glitches?

I will give this a try.

Additionally, I had been considering trying this:

Duplicate the track, and put the effect on one track and vary the opacity, 'blending' to or from the effect. (haven't really tried doing that, Can I change the opacity over time, on a single clip?)

I was also considering:
-Taking the scene, and splitting it in two.
-Applying the filter to one half
-Extending each scene 'half' so that they are now overlapping, and dissolving between the two.


Any comments/suggestions with these options?

Thanks again!
Chienworks wrote on 2/5/2004, 1:11 PM
The splitting probably isn't necessary. If you go with the rendering route then you can highlight that section and render "loop region only" without splitting. If you have the cursor at the beginning of that section when you bring the new version in, you can snap it to the cursor. Place the new version on an upper track and apply a simple fade out for the length of the clip.

If you go with your second method then be aware that things can get flakey if you overlap two clips' beginning and ends exactly. It would probably be better if you extened each part to 1 frame away from the other's beginning/end rather than all the way. This will generate the crossfade automatically. If you extend all the way to the ends then the crossfade will probably disappear.
Express wrote on 2/5/2004, 2:02 PM
OK,

I see the folly of the other ways, and I see how to implement the render suggestion smoothly.

Thanks to both of you for your quick help!