Hi,
I've been using my Sony D8 camcorder as my A/D converter.
I am noticing artifacts in shadow areas of rendered MPEG2s.
I can mask it by decreasing the brightness and increasing the contast
per a post by wvg.
In a another post, Gammaburst mentioned that the Sony's produce an
IRE 0 instead of an IRE 7.5. Could this IRE difference be causing
changes in the brightness and contrast resulting in the 'moving shadows'?
So, I'm curious .. has anyone switched from using their camcorder
to using a Canopus ADVC-100 and seen any improvement in the resulting
captures?
Thanks in advance for any input.
bd
I've been using my Sony D8 camcorder as my A/D converter.
I am noticing artifacts in shadow areas of rendered MPEG2s.
I can mask it by decreasing the brightness and increasing the contast
per a post by wvg.
In a another post, Gammaburst mentioned that the Sony's produce an
IRE 0 instead of an IRE 7.5. Could this IRE difference be causing
changes in the brightness and contrast resulting in the 'moving shadows'?
So, I'm curious .. has anyone switched from using their camcorder
to using a Canopus ADVC-100 and seen any improvement in the resulting
captures?
Thanks in advance for any input.
bd