Can I get an entry-level editting job knowing only Vegas Video?

jmk396 wrote on 3/28/2005, 11:16 AM
I've been fooling around with Vegas Video v4.0 and I really like it. I've made a couple of slideshows and everybody is always very impressed (but perhaps they are only being nice...)

Anyways, I'm interested in learning more about video editting. There is a TON of information on Adobe Premiere but relatively little on Vegas Video. This leads to be believe that Adobe Premiere is more popular (and thus more respected / used more often?)

So my first question is this: Should I continue learning about Vegas Video or should I also learn an alternative like Adobe Premiere? (I know this is a Vegas messageboard, so please forgive me...)

My next question is: How easy is it to get a job as a video editor?

I'm 24 years old (just graduated last year) and I'm working as a database developer. I always enjoyed programming, but as I've found out, I only enjoy doing it as a hobby. I really don't want to be programming for the rest of my life...

Comments

Cheno wrote on 3/28/2005, 11:53 AM
In all honesty, any NLE software will help you to learn the basics. if you want work as an Editor, you'll want to learn Avid or Final Cut Pro.

Vegas is still the bomb when it comes to ease of use and overall workableness, however it's not a player in many post houses at this time. It's starting to get there, but you would be pressed to find need for a Vegas editor in any post house.

Mike
BillyBoy wrote on 3/28/2005, 11:55 AM
Adobe Premiere has been around for a much longer time. Didn't hurt that it was from Adobe, creators of Photoshop. These kinds of threads keep popping up and never really resolve anything. What application is "better" depends on what you are going to use it for, built in prejudice of those already using whatever they use, not surprisingly are a bit bias and tend to overlook flaws. So people here like Vegas, people using Final Cut Pro like that. More information does not always equal better information. While there may be more "help" on Premiere, FCP, some others, that doesn't mean the application or help is better. It just means what it is, there is more of it around. Its very similar to the Mac verses PC argument. There are diehard Mac fans, diehard Linux and UNIX fans, and for sure there are diehard Cub fans, go Cubbies... excuse me, I'm from Chicago.

If you plan to go it alone, then yes you probably will run into some resistance, from the I don't know any better crowd that have heard through the grapevine that to be a "professional" you got to be using X, Y or Z and sorry, most people don't think Vegas is on that short list yet, but times are changing. Getting a job only knowing Vegas probably is going to be more difficult then say if you knew one of the others. Again, you'll face prejudice from the I learned things on such and such application crowd, what the heck do you know kid. You've probably seen lots of that already in programming, where some are very set in their ways, can't, won't change.


Jsnkc wrote on 3/28/2005, 12:13 PM
"if you want work as an Editor, you'll want to learn Avid or Final Cut Pro."

I work as an editor and I have no clue how to use either of those programs.
Jimmy_W wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:17 PM
I work as an editor and I have no clue how to use either of those programs.

Me neither, I think what Cheno basically trying to say is
that employability would be rather narrow not be able to use these other editors.
But times are changing :)

JImmy
Nat wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:18 PM
Jsnkc : Same here, edited some tv shows on Vegas and never touched Avid or FCP...
farss wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:22 PM
Point is if you're truly an editor you shouldn't be fazed by whatever tool you have to use, it's a bit like a racing car driver, I've never heard of one who could only drive one brand of car. Just because most of us could drive a race car around a track without crashing doesn't make us F1 material anymore than knowing how to use an Avid system makes us an editor.
As for getting a salaried job as an editor, can't say I've ever met one who'd recommend that as career path, know a few ex editors who look prematurely old.
Bob.
Jsnkc wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:37 PM
When I came into my job I was stuck with a Video Toaster system...I promptly told them to get rid of it and just get me a copy of Vegas...that was all I needed. So they sold the T2 and we've been using Vegas ever since. Granted were not some big hollywood production company, but we do great things with Vegas.
vitalforce2 wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:44 PM
One thing you weren't asked is: Where are you planning to look? There's a geographic factor. If it's New York or California, if it's film rather than television, the film students around my hood (NYC) are always barking about how you are out of the loop if you're not versed in either FCP or Avid. Now I'd like to learn one of those, but unfortunately I'm too busy editing with Vegas 5 on a home PC. Vegas is so advanced for what it does, going to FCP or Avid is like having a new car but having to back up and learn how to drive with a clutch pedal and manual transmission.

On the other hand, I'm not planning to approach a post house for employment, rather I plan to make indie films and complain to the post houses that they'd get my business if they only had Vegas.
BrianStanding wrote on 3/28/2005, 1:45 PM
All of us Vegas users are editors, many of us make money at it, so, by definition we're "professionals." I'm guessing that most of us work for ourselves, though, and not for a boss.

If you're working for yourself, or if you're boss only wants a finished product, use whatever you want. If you want a job in a shop that uses Avid, learn Avid. Same with FCP. The fact is, not many large edit shops use Vegas yet, so your job opportunities are rather limited.

Best bet, is to learn 'em all, then once you're in, try to convince your shop to switch to Vegas.
Jimmy_W wrote on 3/28/2005, 2:09 PM
Just keep spreading the word!
Jimmy
Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/28/2005, 2:18 PM

Jsnkc, seems your web domain has expired.


FrigidNDEditing wrote on 3/28/2005, 2:48 PM
J - I still have to do VT2 now and then (I orginally started doing things on it - man what a head ache) and I just cringe at the time it took me to do the work that was needed. however 4 is supposed to be better. But I had that thing for editing. Live switching etc.. sure I'll take it - DDR is very handy deal. Not editing though

Dave
Cheno wrote on 3/28/2005, 2:52 PM
Jsnkc,

I work as an editor as well but don't use FCP or Avid either. Traditionally in the post house market, Avid and FCP are the NLE's of choice. That's not to mention though the hundreds of business and production houses that use Sony, Adobe, Leitch, Pinnacle or Canopus systems. You're finding lower and lower cost solutions all over the place and running for them. Tim Duncan uses an Avid all day long but pulls things in and out of Vegas all of the time due to the flexibility of Vegas. There are plenty of commercials and corporate work cut all the time on NLE's other than FCP and Avid, however as much as it sucks, it's like saying the word Kleenex. It's industry standard. I teach in a film school. I teach the aethetics, art and technology of editing using Vegas. I love it, it's stable, the kids learn it easily and it does with we want it to do. We are however adding a FCP HD suite and a Avid DS suite. The reason being is that these are the two NLE's used the most in the film industry. The students need to learn these systems if they're going to be competivive in a film or television editing marketplace. Will other NLE's gain more ground as time goes on? You betcha. However if you're going to go out after an editing job, it helps to know the software that's being used 80% of the places out there.

Like I said, I'm an editor by trade and do not use either. Do I know them? Yup. Just don't like them as much. :)
goshep wrote on 3/28/2005, 3:23 PM
What kind of salary can you expect (working for someone else) as an editor? I saw an ad in Monster for the Sacramento Valley area in California that started at $11 an hour. I'm assuming that is an entry level position limited to dusting off equipment or something....right?

Cheno wrote on 3/28/2005, 4:08 PM
$11 an hour is most likely logging and perhaps some offline work. Never hurts though if it's a foot in the door.

Mike
TheHappyFriar wrote on 3/28/2005, 5:40 PM
I'd say it depends on the editing job. If you work fomr someone who has all the equipment then you've got to work with what they have.