OK, what is happening. All images are the same size/resolution. 200 images as a music/vid compilation are est at 10 Mbytes in the optimization dialog. 200 images in a picture compilation are 1 Gbyte. So after they're encoded, why the difference?
Music compilation encodes only one frame, not matter how long the video lasts on the screen. Very efficient, but obviously you cannot have any movement. A picture compilation actually creates real video from the picture. By "real" video I mean that it creates 24, 25, or 30 frames for each second of running time. This permits movement. This also means that it will take up a lot of space.
If all you need is still photos, and you don't need to vary the time they are on screen, you can put a LOT of still photos onto a DVD using Music Compilation. I do this all the time as an "extras" option, especially when I have some event, and everyone contributes still photos. I put the video of the event on the DVD in the usual way; I put the still photos in their original format in an "extras" folder that can only be read when the disc is put into a computer; and for those who don't have a computer, I add the Music Compilation with all the photos. This last item only adds a few megabytes to the project, even with hundreds and hundreds of photos.
Thanks John. Now any way to convert a picture compilation to a music one? I have 200 images I've adjusted the levels, cropping etc. on in DVDA that I don't want to do over.