Comments

SonyDennis wrote on 6/2/2002, 3:50 PM
Digital Betacam uses 4:2:2 YCrCb sampling, whereas DV uses 4:1:1, so you have "half" the chroma resolution. DigiBeta tranfers use uncompressed Serial Digital Interface (SDI), which requires a fancy PCI card (such as a VideoPump) to get into and out of a PC. Inside the deck, it uses some light DCT-style compression, but nothing that most people could notice.

DV uses a $50 OHCI Firewire (IEEE-1394) card to transfer into/out of a PC, and the file sizes are significantly smaller than DigiBeta because the compression is in the file format and tranfer, not just the deck/camera. It's a little heavier compression as well, which can cause "mosquito noise" in areas with lots of detail.

Nearly any recent PC can deal with DV; you need a pretty snorty PC to deal with DigiBeta, and much larger hard disks. You can expect to pay about a magnitude more for the video hardware as well <g>.

I am not a DigiBeta expert, so I might have missed some things here, so if anyone else has any comments, toss them in.

///d@
kkolbo wrote on 6/3/2002, 4:17 PM
That is a good technical look at it. From an idiot's perspective (that's me), DV rivals BetaCam from the aspect of quality after edit because of the loses introduced by BetaCam's analog nature. DigiBeta is a step above that. It has the digital advantages of DV but with a higher data rate and more chroma information.