Disappointed with version 10

stevefoobar wrote on 8/30/2010, 4:00 PM
I installed version 10 this past weekend and while I'm thankful for some features and plug-ins that are very welcome, and thankful for the extra tracks, overall I'm disappointed. For me, on my WinXP Pro SP3, Intel Dual-Core 2.0 gHz CPU, 3.5 GB RAM computer, it runs AVCHD files so slowly that it is impossible to edit using the preview window. These files actually ran better in version 9! Furthermore, the program is "flaky" (that's a technical term) and crashed 6 times inside of 8 hours when ver 9 never crashes. This is on the same computer using the same settings and the same codecs.

It especially seems to have problems with multiple tracks of video using the chroma key plug-in. At one point after adding a new chroma key track and using the Deform plug-in also, the preview window showed random color bars (distorted because of the Deform plug-in) at various frames of the video where the new track video should have showed up making it completely useless. I thought perhaps the problem was with the preview function but when I rendered the video, the odd color bars were there also.

Has anyone else had multiple problems with version 10?

I know they will fix these problems eventually and I also broke my own cardinal rule of never buying version X.0 of ANY software, but it's still disappointing to have to revert back to using version 9, which is precisely what I've had to do.

Does anyone have any performance tips for version 10? I have tried tweaking all settings in the Options, Preferences, Video and Preview Device tabs but they made no difference in performance whatsoever.

Once again, I find it disheartening that version 9 performs substantially better with the same files on the same computer with the same codecs.

Thanks.

Comments

KenJ62 wrote on 8/30/2010, 6:37 PM
I am quite happy with version 10 but then I am editing HDV from an HV20. I just finished a 105 minute wedding video producing Blu-ray and DVDs. Sometimes mpeg files have glitch problems which need to be straightened out first to avoid crashes.

I built a new PC last December. Couldn't afford latest tech so used quad core Q9400 OC'd to 3.2 GHz. My recommendation is to have as many cores as possible for NLE. Also recommend Win7 - it is very good for memory management. I have only 2 GBs but it has not been a problem. I also have two fast but lower cost Samsung HD500HJ HDDs which can provide 110 Mb/s throughput.
JayLJohnston wrote on 8/31/2010, 10:06 AM
Yeah, I think it might be your PC performance. I just built a powerhoues PC on an i7-950 and it screams. Rendering still takes quite a while, but it's not terribly bad. I wish I could allocate more memory to the program as I have 12GB but haven't ever had it go over 3GB usage. I think that's the program's limitations though.