Comments

Cliff Etzel wrote on 5/19/2008, 10:39 PM
When Stage6 was active, I had a reason to use DivX - with Stage6 defunct, why would I or anyone else want to consider DivX???

Cliff Etzel - Solo Video Journalist
bluprojekt | SoloVJ.com
Laurence wrote on 5/19/2008, 10:42 PM
Well for one thing, it will play back on a bunch of hardware devices including my PS3, the DVD player in my bedroom, my small Archos media player.

For another, the codec is efficient enough to play back HD smoothly on an old Pentium 3 laptop we have around the house.

A third thing is that the encode seems to be way quicker than anything else and is pretty foolproof as far as the configuration settings go if you use the little encoder application.
Houston Haynes wrote on 5/20/2008, 12:31 AM
DivX is making a major push into firmware/hardware - I think this is worth a looksee.
jrazz wrote on 5/20/2008, 5:30 AM
I was as bummed as the next guy when Stage6 shut down, however, I would not count DivX out when it comes to that line of service. Sometimes a business needs to cut their losses and pull out, regroup and go from there.

With that being said, blip.tv allows up to 1 gig per file of divx or almost any other file type and you can embed it and link to it and it encodes to flash and uploads to your myspace and facebook pages if you want it to.

j razz
DJPadre wrote on 5/20/2008, 7:20 AM
divx should have been utilised in HD camcorders...
Cliff Etzel wrote on 5/20/2008, 8:23 AM
Since so much of my work revolves around internet content distribution for news and online documentaries (streaming media content), I see DivX as a niche platform as stated for hardware devices.

Maybe it's worth reconsidering but my plate is so full right now, I barely have time to think about anything else.

Cliff Etzel - Solo Video Journalist
bluprojekt | SoloVJ.com
TheHappyFriar wrote on 5/20/2008, 8:32 AM
why would I or anyone else want to consider DivX???

you may think divx is useless, but millions of non-video people out there use it all the time. divx is more universally accepted on more computers then mpeg-2/mp4/quicktime/wmv and has more hardware support then those combined (mpeg-2 files, not DVD's). i'd say it's second to flash only because of youtube & the like.