Comments

nlamartina wrote on 4/30/2002, 1:15 AM
Yes.
Rednroll wrote on 4/30/2002, 9:33 AM
Lol, I have to add this one on the top of my collection of "stupid posts" list.

HELLO!?
ramallo wrote on 4/30/2002, 12:38 PM
Hello,

Why?, isn't a correct?, have you another better reply?.

Go with this way boy, I'm impressed with you.

Bye
Rednroll wrote on 4/30/2002, 1:05 PM
I'm not sure what you said, but I was speaking about the original post. Sorry for the misunderstanding
ramallo wrote on 4/30/2002, 1:44 PM
Hello Rednroll,

I thought that your post was a reply to my post (follow my post).

Sorry for the mistake ;-)

Regards
decrink wrote on 4/30/2002, 8:06 PM
I've been wondering if Sonic Foundry makes a program that can record music? Is it possible to record music using a computer?
MyST wrote on 5/1/2002, 5:32 AM
Using a what?!?
Chienworks wrote on 5/1/2002, 7:05 AM
TASCAM 688! It does 8 tracks on a standard cassette tape, record up to 4 tracks simultaneously, 20 input mixer with 10 XLR balanced inputs, 4 busses, 3 effects sends, 4 band parametric EQ on each channel, automated routing and punching in/out, MIDI sync, 3.75 ips with +/- 30% variable speed, individual track outs, DBX noise reduction, post mixing allows 12 live inputs and 8 tracks simultaneously .... etc.

List price was about $3800, but there's a broadcast & studio supply store near me that will sell you the one they have for $1400/obo.

No computer necessary. ;)
drbam wrote on 5/1/2002, 8:53 AM
<Lol, I have to add this one on the top of my collection of "stupid posts" list.
HELLO!? >

Well, I don't know Rednroll. . . in light of SoFo's most recent marketing approach with V V3, I think the post is pretty valid and certainly underscores many of the criticisms and concerns some of us have posted regarding SoFo's commitment to Vegas *Audio.* In other words, if a person isn't already quite familar with Vegas, as it stands now, one would really have to read the "small print" and probably ask around a lot to determine if SoFo actually offers a "multitrack" recording application (just as artfilms did here).

drbam
Former user wrote on 5/1/2002, 9:54 AM
I have to agree with this last thread. For someone who may have just found out about Sonic Foundry and has a quick glance at the product names - who would even associate multitrack recording with Vegas "Video"...there has been a ton of posts in here from amateurs and pros alike who wondered the same thing.

Cuzin B
Rednroll wrote on 5/1/2002, 10:13 AM
Who would associate names like "Pro-Tools, Nuendo, Cubase, and Cakewalk" with a multi-track program? I see your point though, if you go under the "products" page, it lists Vegas Video in the "Video Editing" section only. It should be listed under the "audio editing" column also. This is all about "marketing", which equates into advertising dollars. I've seen some pretty bone head moves with the Sonic Foundry marketing, I think they need to work on that.

I originally just thought this was pretty humurous though, if you're making a post in the "Vegas-Audio" forum, and asking if SF makes a "multi-track" program. I was like "HELLO!, look infront of you". They do make it a little difficult to find this information, unless you dig into the specifications of all the products listed.
Former user wrote on 5/1/2002, 10:53 AM
RednRoll,

I initially thought this request was a bit odd and I was going to blow it off as completely dumb, but then I thought about it for a while and I looked at what Sonic presents to the world on their web site...then I put myself in the shoes of someone who doesn't know the company like I do and then tried to answer the initial question - You know, at first glance - it was pretty painful to find out if SF offers a multitrack solution...it just doesn't jump out at you (and it should).

Take a look here http://www.sonicfoundry.com/products/home.asp and tell me if you see anything that resembles "multitrack recording". Vegas should be located squarely under Audio Editing as well as Video Editing...

SF is making a huge assumption here that only "Video" editors need apply - there are a ton of us who use this product successfully for audio editing everyday.

In the end - this question wasn't silly at all - it was a simple validation that SF marketing is missing the boat big time for potential sales.

Cuzin B
Musiclover wrote on 5/1/2002, 2:36 PM
I am a living proof of one of the new comers who got confused about SF product. I bought Vegas 2.0 because it was at substantial discount at Mars and the sales guy told me it would do what I needed to. I did not realize that it has video recording feature. The manual is totally confusing for some one interested in audio only, you have to try very hard to sift through the pages to find what you want. At times I get very frustrated but having invested money, I am trying to make the best of it.

I have to admit though, once you get used to it, Vegas seems pretty easy to use. Then again, I have limited experience.
VU-1 wrote on 5/1/2002, 3:28 PM
Vegas is, by far, the easiest to use, the easiest to learn and the most intuitive multitrack AUDIO recording/editing software program on the market. (period)

JL
OTR

(But why don't they just call it "Vegas" or "Vegas Pro" or "Splash" or "Media Frenzy" or ......?)
VU-1 wrote on 5/2/2002, 12:46 PM
HA!!! Perfect example of what we've been talking about!......

I copied these posts off of a thread in the Sound Forge section:

>>"You may want to look in to Vegas to record your voice along with other tracks, it allows you to adjust the volume of each track independently."<<

>>"i am unable to find vegas lol cept for vegas video."<<

Now what was that "M"-word again?......M-m-m-a-a-a-r-r-r-k-e-e-e-t-i-n-n-n-g-g-g ???

JL
OTR

(.....or "Media Magic", or "A/V Pro", or "Sights-n-Sounds Deluxe!", or .......)