Comments

Spot|DSE wrote on 10/14/2003, 11:36 PM
Nope.
You can render Flash to uncompressed avi and then import, or render as sequential tga and import, but swf or fla files can't be opened in Vegas.
cheroxy wrote on 10/15/2003, 8:34 AM
The avi render will only work if there isn't a script running withing the fla file.
Jsnkc wrote on 10/15/2003, 9:49 AM
Doesn't the screenblast video thing allow you to either import or export flash? I thought I read something about that in a diffrent post.
Spot|DSE wrote on 10/15/2003, 10:47 AM
That's screenblast, but not Vegas.
Jsnkc wrote on 10/15/2003, 11:29 AM
That's what I thought, might be worth picking up a copy of it if you plan to do a lot of work with Flash.
rmack350 wrote on 10/15/2003, 11:43 AM
Or perhaps picking up a copy of Flash...

Rob Mack
stormstereo wrote on 10/15/2003, 12:09 PM
Hehe, good one rmack.

If you're using Screenblast to make commercial stuff, I mean - to make money from in a business, it probably has some things in the end user license agreement you want to be aware of before a purchase. Do a search in this forum, I think there's several threads about it.

Best/Tommy
rmack350 wrote on 10/15/2003, 1:43 PM
It's not unreasonable for a compositing tool to provide some flash functionality. After Effects does this. But After Effects isn't an NLE.

Still, Vegas could output track motion to a flash file. Or to an MPEG4 file, I suppose.

It's not a primary function of Vegas, though. Here I'd probably be in the BillyBoy camp-if it doesn't directly relate to Vegas and editing I'd leave it for third parties. It really depends on how much use it would be. If it brought more people into Vegas that's great.

Rob Mack
Jsnkc wrote on 10/15/2003, 2:26 PM
I think screenblast is a lot cheaper than flash.
DigiMortal wrote on 10/15/2003, 11:13 PM
TNX