With all the variable bit rate and 2-pass MPG rendering, I understand that it gives the best quality for the smallest size based on selected parameters. But it seems to me that the wrong question is being asked. I don't care about max/min/avg bit rates per se. I simply want to get the best quality for my, for example, 64min video that will fit on a 4.7G DVD.
I guess I could do trial and error, and let it render 4 or 5 times and pick the result that is closest to 4.7G w/o exceeding it. But I really don't have time for a bunch of wasted renders.
Am I missing something? Is the best answer just to keep the bitrate low to guarantee it will be small enough, even if it ends up only filling half the DVD? Or is there a better technique?
I guess I could do trial and error, and let it render 4 or 5 times and pick the result that is closest to 4.7G w/o exceeding it. But I really don't have time for a bunch of wasted renders.
Am I missing something? Is the best answer just to keep the bitrate low to guarantee it will be small enough, even if it ends up only filling half the DVD? Or is there a better technique?