While I congratulate you on your findings, these mean nothing to someone else. Since GPU acceleration was introduced with VP11, users of this forum have always used the SCS Benchmark project as a reference. Without a reference, your findings are just that, yours only.

Link to that is broken (404 file not found). BTW you logic is flawed, it is the classical error of arguing from the specific to the general or fallacy of illicit transference. You are a sample of one and while they may not have value to you someone with a similar system may find them useful as a general reference.

Just a quick test on i7700 4.2 /4.4 32 gig AMD480 8 gig 512 SSD render disc.

 

3 20 second UHD from Panasonic Gx8 cameras, each clip has 4 different GPU effects, two have been moved/boxed. effects ranges from simple color/sharpen to polar warp, insect vision and similar intensive Fx's.

Render to 4K 100mb both upper and lower value AMD VCE 29.97 fps 45 seconds.

My hats off to this version, this is blazing compared to my old tests which I didn't keep records on, but this makes doing some very cool stuff now very reasonable only my System. i7700 4.2/4.4 OC system. GPU drawing 38/42 to 130 watts @ 90% @ 58 Cel, CPU 50 Cel @ 60-75% (very seldom more).

With 6 fans and liquid cooling I can see being able to actual do some longer pieces in a single render.

Hi, I'm interested. How many fps do you have with 4k (with or without proxy?) With fx applied in the preview set.in best (full), and what resolution of the project...

While I congratulate you on your findings, these mean nothing to someone else. Since GPU acceleration was introduced with VP11, users of this forum have always used the SCS Benchmark project as a reference. Without a reference, your findings are just that, yours only.

Link to that is broken (404 file not found). BTW you logic is flawed, it is the classical error of arguing from the specific to the general or fallacy of illicit transference. You are a sample of one and while they may not have value to you someone with a similar system may find them useful as a general reference.

About the link, I have the same problem in finding to expose my bench.
One idea I had was that Vegas came with a benchmark system included.
Well, we could share with the whole community, for a common good and each one to find the ideal solution in terms of hardware.

J

Hi, I'm interested. How many fps do you have with 4k (with or without proxy?) With fx applied in the preview set.in best (full), and what resolution of the project...

Fx viewable, I did a quick test with one 20 second 4K 100 mbs UHD from Panasonic Gx8 - color corrected (gamma/saturation), mid sharpening, and Ignite perspective @ -39. I then put 3 jpegs from 20 Mp sensor on another track and resized and moved them. video was always 3O FPS and the still went by very fast (doesn't give FPS on them).

I am sure there are still some Fx stuff that will give the machine fits but on play back never saw more than 38% on the GPU.

@D7K, I am curious about your GPU timeline performance in multicam edit mode as I use a similar GPU (RX580). Suppose you stack, say, 4 tracks of the 4K 100mb UHD from your Panny GX8 and create a multicam track, what sort of preview playback performance do you get in the multicam edit mode (CTRL+Shift+D)? I regularly work on multicam projects of multiple 4K footage but the preview performance on my PC is awful with the playback speed often falling to 1 ~ 2fps, which I would like to somehow accelerate a bit. I know I probably should start using proxy but it takes a long time to create one. Thanks in advance.