This maybe a really dumb thought but here goes.
I've been working with a lot of 16:9 lately and that does use pretty well stretched pixels. Now with DV25 that's just the way it is so no point trying anything interesting.
However coming off HiRes stills or HDV things could be different. I'm thinking 16:9 with square pixels, 1049x576 in PAL. I can see no technical reason why a DVD player would not cope (specs not withstanding), it seems I can run Vegas that way. The DVD player just feeds analogue RGB or YUV to the TV so shouldn't be an issue there either. I don't know if DVDA will cope or not.
If no one can think of a reason why this wouldn't work I might give it a whirl.
I've got a DVD of footage off a HDW F900 and it still looks better than anything I can get off very high res stills or HDV, did the guy who authored it know something I (we) don't?
Bob.
I've been working with a lot of 16:9 lately and that does use pretty well stretched pixels. Now with DV25 that's just the way it is so no point trying anything interesting.
However coming off HiRes stills or HDV things could be different. I'm thinking 16:9 with square pixels, 1049x576 in PAL. I can see no technical reason why a DVD player would not cope (specs not withstanding), it seems I can run Vegas that way. The DVD player just feeds analogue RGB or YUV to the TV so shouldn't be an issue there either. I don't know if DVDA will cope or not.
If no one can think of a reason why this wouldn't work I might give it a whirl.
I've got a DVD of footage off a HDW F900 and it still looks better than anything I can get off very high res stills or HDV, did the guy who authored it know something I (we) don't?
Bob.