Importing Vegas project to DVDA?

GirlsAreThe666 wrote on 11/18/2003, 9:20 PM
i just went to render my negas project file to mpeg2 and it says 14 hours.lol.

im sure you can import it into to DVDA and have it compressed there yeah?

also whats an acceptable timeframe? that seems pretty long.lol.

and how much video can actually be compressed to dvd and still look good? i want to fit about 1 hour 45 mins.

i shoot with a vx-2000 so my cam is good, but i usually edit with premiere..lol. i just switched.

Comments

clearvu wrote on 11/18/2003, 9:49 PM
I've gotten about 2 hours of video on a DVD with very good results. You should have no problem fitting 1.75 hrs, provided you don't have too many menus, especially with moving thumbnails.
johnmeyer wrote on 11/18/2003, 10:59 PM
Everyone has different thresholds for quality. Given that you are using a very good camera, it would be a shame to give up too much quality by over-compressing the video. Speaking strictly for my own tastes, I would not try to put much more than 75-80 minutes on a DVD when the source was good quality DV from a first-rate camera. Once you start getting into the 90-100 minute range, you are going to start noticing things during dissolves and fast action.

Of course if all you have is talking-head video, then you can probably put two hours on a DVD and not notice much degradation.
EdK wrote on 11/19/2003, 12:02 AM
I have to disagree with johnmeyer........If the quality of the video is excellent, which of course depends on the lighting availble and the camera and the camera operator, you can put more than 2 hours on the DVD. If however you are shooting a candlelight wedding than no, you should not go over 80 - 90 minutes.
johnmeyer wrote on 11/19/2003, 1:12 AM
The quality of what is acceptable depends a whole lot on what you are trained to see. Here's an example of what I mean:

There was an interesting post about a month ago in the AVS forum from someone who had purchased a DLP projector. One of the problems these have is fringing during movement because the three primary colors are created by projecting though a rotating color wheel. Thus each primary color is offset in time from the other two pirmary colors. This can cause color fringes at the edges of the moving object. The guy who made the post knew about the fringing, but loved his projector initially.

Then, one day, he saw it. It had been there all along, but he just didn't know what to look for. Once he saw it, he couldn't stand it.

There is probably a moral to this story, but I won't attempt to describe it, other than to note that the only thing that matters is if you (or your client) is satisfied.
wobblyboy wrote on 11/25/2003, 11:25 PM
DVDA or Vegas should be about the same for rendering time. I don't think it would be worth rendering to AVI and letting DVDA re render. Time depends on how much effects, color correction etc. you have. 14 hours seems very long. I just rendered 1 hour video to MPEG 2 in Vegas and it took 1.5 hours. (almost stright AVI). You might get and hour and 45 minutes on a DVD if you don't have much else on it. If not you could play with lower bitrate and check quality.
kameronj wrote on 11/26/2003, 4:21 AM
14 hours is about right to render a file in Vegas that has been compressed with some other type of compression (...oh, like say DivX).

About 1 hr and 45 minutes sounds like a good size for a regular 'movie'. Yes....DVDA can handle this amout of video with no problem.

No...you can not import directly from Vegas into DVDA. Think about it this way - there would be nothing to import. Until you render in Vegas - all you really have are pointers. You don't actually modify the original file.

hope that answers your question.