interlaced VS non-interlaced for 16:9

FuTz wrote on 1/11/2003, 4:01 PM
I got a technical question.
Will I get a better quality, for a 16x9 final version, if I shoot with interlaced switch set to ON on my camera and framing according to the final 16x9 render or is it just my ticket into a series of tweaks concerning interlace and field adjustments?
I mean, is it really worth it compared to just plain shoot 16x9 non-interlaced and edit the usual way?
I ask 'cause my camera offers the interlaced possibility but only with 4:3...

Comments

No comments yet - be the first to write a comment...