Comments

Chienworks wrote on 4/9/2005, 5:44 PM
If you don't mind crude ... reduce the resolution and reduce the frame rate. I sent an hours' worth of clips to someone through the 'net as 160x120 15fps Cinepak files. The total file size was only about 100MB and (if i recall correctly, but i may be forgetting) i think it only took me about 40 minutes on an 866MHz P3 to encode the whole lot.
TomG wrote on 4/9/2005, 5:53 PM
Thanks, Kelly...

Is there much difference in rendering .avi, .mov, .wmv, etc??? (Timewise, that is)
Chienworks wrote on 4/9/2005, 5:55 PM
Generally the more compression or the higher the quality setting, the longer it takes to render. It doesn't seem to matter a whole lot which format is used.

I chose cinepak because the extention was .avi. I had had the other person install the demo of Vegas so that she could play around with the initial edits with the small versions of the clips. After she got a rough cut together she sent me the .veg file and i was able to open it up with the full size DV versions of the files for the finishing and final rendering.