Peter - thank you for your response. It comes as a great
relief.....!

Peter Haller wrote:
>>Not to worry.
>>
>>The grouping is only for display, not for the disc data
which is
>>simply a
>>string of numbers
>>
>>So, you don't need a new app and no, there wont be a
patch for this,
>>as it
>>is not a problem. You discs will be written correctly and
conform.
>>
>>Peter Haller
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Eventide wrote in message ...
>>>I have just been informed by the Head of Broadcasting at
>>>Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) in London, in
>>>response to my query, that the format which CD Architect
>>>imposes on ISRC codes is incorrect and DOES NOT conform
to
>>>ISO 3901, rendering all ISRCs encoded in this format
>>>INVALID.
>>>
>>>The problem is in the last 5 digits (designation code).
CD
>>>Architect imposes the early prototype ISRC format, where
>>>the last 5 digits are grouped "XXXX-X". For the last
eight
>>>years or so, they should have been grouped "XXXXX".
>>>
>>>The correct overall format should be:
>>>
>>>"XX-XXX-XX-XXXXX"
>>>
>>>Users should be aware of this fact, and hopefully we
might
>>>see a swift patch from Sonic Foundry (please!). I have
>>>urgent ISRC requirements, and will have to resort to
other
>>>packages to ensure the integrity of the ISRCs unless a
>>>quick patch is forthcoming.....
>>
>>
>>