Load times of VP13 compared to VP14 Observations and MAGIX to Repro

Grazie wrote on 9/27/2016, 3:45 AM

My experience - just tested.

Aim:
To compare MXF Load times between VP13 and VP14.

Base DATA:

  • Canon XF300 MXF Media.
  • Project Media Size: 1.11 GBs
  • Project Run-time: 3mins 5 secs


Experiment:

  • Timed against a iOS9 APPLE Stopwatch.
  • Ran alternating, separate iterations of VP13 and VP14 which contained the same amount and same MXF media.
  • On closing VP13 and VP14 interrogated Project Manager to confirm their completed closure

Results:

  • VP13: 10.1 secs ; 9.4 secs ; 9.7 secs ; MM removed 9.7
  • VP14: 14.0 secs ; 12.3 secs ; 12.9 secs ; MM removed 9.3 secs ; Again no MM 9.4

Observations:
Obs 1: Noteworthy drop in load time when Media Manager is removed from VP14 Project. Here that is a difference of between 4 and 3 seconds over a 03:05 project.

Obs 2: However, removal of Media Manager from VP13 makes no difference.

Conclusions:
VP13 would appear to be optimized to load Media Manager and VP14 is not.

Recommendation:
I present these finding to MAGIX for their advise.

Last changed by Grazie on 9/27/2016, 3:46 AM, changed a total of 1 times.

Grazie

PC 10 64-bit 64gb * Intel Core i9 10900X s2066 * EVGA RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra 10GB - Studio Driver 551.23 * 4x16G CorsVengLPX DDR4 2666C16 * Asus TUF X299 MK 2


Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX60HS Bridge

Comments

No comments yet - be the first to write a comment...