Just a question for the techies...
I have noticed that if I render an.avi file into MPEG2 using Vegas, then get DVD Architect to burn to disc, the result is NOT as crisp as having DVDA deal with the .avi file in the first place.
In other words having the flow being;
.avi -> MPEG2 in Vegas -> DVDA -> disc = OK
.avi->MPEG2 in DVDA-> disc = better than OK
This includes permutations in the Vegas rendering such as two pass, VBR. DVDA states it is NOT recompressing the incoming MPEG file.
Any ideas why the process gives a better result?
Ben
I have noticed that if I render an.avi file into MPEG2 using Vegas, then get DVD Architect to burn to disc, the result is NOT as crisp as having DVDA deal with the .avi file in the first place.
In other words having the flow being;
.avi -> MPEG2 in Vegas -> DVDA -> disc = OK
.avi->MPEG2 in DVDA-> disc = better than OK
This includes permutations in the Vegas rendering such as two pass, VBR. DVDA states it is NOT recompressing the incoming MPEG file.
Any ideas why the process gives a better result?
Ben