my avi files are MASSIVE! a 5 minute video = 1.3 gigs?!?!?!?!

snowball wrote on 7/26/2004, 10:24 PM
I have been doing a TON of video editing using my quicktime movies and using sony's vegas video editing suite.

I've got some really cool stuff going on, but my videos are MASSIVE!

a 5 minute video is about 1.19 GIGS (in avi format)!!! This is getting nuts.

Why are my files so big? What can i do to fit these 18 files on a dvd?

Anyone out there lend me a hand?

Thanks!!!

Comments

jaegersing wrote on 7/26/2004, 10:51 PM
This size sounds about right for a DV file, which is great for archiving and further editing.

If you want DVD format, you need to render the project as an MPEG2 file. Check the Render As options to see the choices available, and look for the MainConcept MEPG encoder.

Richard Hunter
Spot|DSE wrote on 7/26/2004, 11:32 PM
DVD uses MPEG. Avi is an editing and archiving format. avi is 13 gig per hour in DV format/codec. MPEG is variable. MPEG is a delivery format, not an editing format.
For purposes of math, figure 200 meg per minute. (it's actually slightly more than that, but it's a nice fat, round number you can remember quickly) MPEG is variable in size depending on bitrate.
It's not nuts, it's good vid. If you are starting with QT files that WEREN'T DV to start with, then set your Vegas system properties to reflect the output and preview settings to match the properties of your QT files. But if you're resampling upwards from a low rez QT to DV, expect a quality hit because it's a higher resolution and datarate when converted to DV from QT.
HTH
Grazie wrote on 7/26/2004, 11:38 PM
Your about right.

My latest project,: 6:30 mins in AVI produces 1.45gig rendered to MPEG for DVD it comes out at 0.358 MPEG. I could improve on this, but it still would give me around 18 mins of DVD for 1gig and then - if my maths is correct - 84 mins for a standard 4.7 platter. So, 84 mins is close to 1.5 hours, not too bad eh?

As I say I could "squeeze" more onto a DVD by fiddling with the coding up of the MPEG . . still experimenting with this. BUT at the end of the day, for me, it is all about getting the BEST quality to the client that I can achieve NOT about squeezing as much as possible onto the platter. I don't make full 1.5 hour films, I make shorts for organisations, and try to keep my production values as high as my knowledge allows.

However, am I correct int thinking you are concerned about the amount of HD space you are chewing up? If this is the case, get another HD. This is the best time to over dose on extra real estate. My belief is that you can't have enough GIG space. Besides my system drive, I've got 2x120=240 + 1x160 + 340 of ext firewire drives. This equate to 740gb. This is now tiny compared to what some of the Editors have here .. . the reason I say all this is to determione if your are considering to go MPEG and edit in this format - are you? My advice is don't. Get some extra HD space and edit in your own version of my PAL-DV AVI - yeah?

If you were asking purely as to find out how you get your GIGs of AVI onto a 4.7 platter, then don't worry, it is through MPEG compression.

Grazie
snowball wrote on 7/28/2004, 3:54 PM
So it is possible to have 40 gigs worth of AVIs that could still fit on a dvd?

Is it best to render the clips as a mpeg directly then?
snowball wrote on 7/28/2004, 4:06 PM
ok, i think i get it.

So at the end of the day, if I have about 21 gigs of 'raw' avi file, I should be ok then, right?

I'll re-read the manual, but should I keep the file in avi format when using dvd architect and allow dvd architect to convert the files to mpeg? Or should I render the files as mpegs from vegas?

Thanks for the help folks!
busterkeaton wrote on 7/28/2004, 4:07 PM
You should edit with .avi files and when you are done, render to mpeg-2.

40 gig of Avi is a little over three hours of footage. To get three hours on a DVD, you would have to use a very low bit rate to do that. That means your quality is going to be low. So it's a tradeoff. Even Hollywood movies that use DVD-9 (more data on the disks) and really expensive encoders sometimes have to use 2 DVDs for long movies.

Do a search on this board or the web for mpeg calculator, it will help you figure this stuff out.
farss wrote on 7/28/2004, 5:35 PM
REndering straight from Vegas will give slightly better results.
However rendering to a new avi MAY be quicker overall.
Rendering (actaully its encoding) from Vegas means it has to be calculate all the FXs etc and then pass the frame out to the encoder.
If you find something wrong with the encode like you chose the wrong bitrate the whole process has to be repeated.
If you render to a new avi and encode from that you can make minor changes possibly and/or alter the encoder settings withour having to have the whole thing done again.
Either way has its pluses and minuses, depends also where your source came from and how many FXs your are applying. If the material is DV and you're not doing things like CC then going to a new avi shouldn't involve any quality hit.

Bob.
Liam_Vegas wrote on 7/28/2004, 8:13 PM
My belief is that you can't have enough GIG space

too true... I am just formatting drive "VIDEO17". About 3000GB so far and rising!

I have 3 external firewire/usb drives into which I have removeable drive trays. Makes it really quick and easy to switch projects.

Jessariah67 wrote on 7/28/2004, 8:23 PM
I remember setting up my first audio computer with TWO 12G hard drives...back then, that was all the space in the world. Now, I have two computers running 9 hard drives -- a little over a TB of space.

Invest in swappable bays and be glad hard drives are so cheap : )
wobblyboy wrote on 7/28/2004, 11:57 PM
I usually render to MPEG 2 from Vegas and let DVDA encode sound to AC3. Rendering sound is fast and if I do it in Vegas I have to render video and sound seperatly.
Grazie wrote on 7/28/2004, 11:59 PM
WB! Now THAT makes a shed load of sense! Thanks!

Grazie
farss wrote on 7/29/2004, 1:22 AM
If you encode to mpeg from Vegas why wouldn't you also encode to ac3 from Vegas?

When you're in DVDA you have to load the mpeg file and then tell DVDA the matching audio is in an .avi file. This means DVDA has to strip the audio from the .avi file then feed it into the encoder. I suppose that's not a big issue but you also loose control over the encoder setting and the defaults are not usually the way you would want to go.

Bob.
Grazie wrote on 7/29/2004, 1:45 AM
now . .which way to turn? .. left or right . .. ? ;-)
PeterWright wrote on 7/29/2004, 1:55 AM
If you render to DVDPAL or DVD NTSC templates, this includes audio (PCM).
I always work this way too - let DVDA do the AC3.
Spot|DSE wrote on 7/29/2004, 1:55 AM
Encode everything in Vegas. You have more control. Normalization and LMP can be controlled in VEgas but not in DVDA. Plus, you know for certain which audio you're rendering, and don't have to worry about an extra frame or half frame.
Grazie wrote on 7/29/2004, 2:35 AM
Ignorance here, what is "LMP " Spot?
farss wrote on 7/29/2004, 3:00 AM
Line Mode Profile thingy, sorry machine Vegas machine recording audio (French would you believe!) so I cannot check its exact name.

Grazie wrote on 7/29/2004, 3:19 AM
Cheers . .
Randy Brown wrote on 7/29/2004, 6:56 AM
One of my steady gigs is producing sports highlights of the entire season. Throughout the season I capture one or 2 games at a time and only actually keep (on a HD) a couple of minutes from each game. When it gets close to the end of the season I start freaking out wondering if I have enough good footage to make my 20 minute minimum so I came up with a simple formula to check how many (approx) minutes of raw footage I have. To calculate how big an .AVI will be after renedering I suppose you could just reverse it:
Gigabytes divided by 13 multiplied by 60 = minutes of AVI ( ie 6.5 divided by 13 = 0.5 multiplied by 60 = 30 minutes of AVI.
If this is common knowledge....uhhh....sorry.
Randy