My first HD clip on Vimeo

farss wrote on 12/26/2008, 2:03 PM
http://www.vimeo.com/2635558

Shot on EX1 at SP 50i. All cut aways were shot at rehearsals and some of the audio is bits patched in from them as well. As the composer / conductor was making changes to the score and tempo during rehearsals some creative speed changes were done in Vegas. As the performers were wearing civies during rehearsals some shallow DOF was also done in Vegas in a feeble attempt to hide the continuity errors. There's a tiny amount of work done in AE but only because it was easier. It all could have been done in Vegas.

To get it into Vimeo I created a 720p25 AVI using the 8 bit Sony YUV codec. De-interlacing was done by setting project de-interlace method to Blend. That was speed changed to 24p (not 23.97) and encoded to mp4 at 4Mb/sec for upload.
Only problem I have is somewhere in the process something has take some liberties with the blacks. I'd used to custom color curve to stretch them originally and I'm almost certain the mp4 file I uploaded was fine. Need to look into this further as I dislike crushed blacks.

Bob.

Comments

PeterWright wrote on 12/26/2008, 3:37 PM
Well put together from different performances Bob - looks and sounds good.

Did you have any control over lighting? - It looks nice and natural.
Did you use any Picture Profile or just standard?
What mics, and where placed?
Peter
ushere wrote on 12/26/2008, 4:39 PM
now this is where life gets complicated....

saw and replied to your vid on facebook via vm's introduction to it. pretty much echo pw's comments, and you answered my shooting question here...

so, with all these bloody lines of communication, where exactly are we to talk? i'm not going to start dual conversions....

still, i'll repeat for anyone popping by - bloody good video, great sound....
farss wrote on 12/26/2008, 4:43 PM
"Did you have any control over lighting? - It looks nice and natural. "

None at all. I would have gladly paid for some serious lighting myself however we had a problem. If I'd started to make it look like a "pro" shoot the church and the performers would have started asking for serious money. As it was the conductor / client was over $2K out of pocket just for the privelege of having his work performed in public.

"Did you use any Picture Profile or just standard?"

Just standard. Got a white balance off a card and left it and the iris alone. Much of the lighting on the day was coming in the windows and the clouds didn't help.

The organ was a bit of a problem. The pedals are lit by very green fluros, the keyboard by halogen downlights and there's some HID lighting that also creeps in and mystery blue light from somewhere as well.

"What mics, and where placed?"
Most of the audio is from one of the EX1's own mics plus my Sanken CS-1 on the camera into the other channel. I had the CS-1 because I'd found from the rehearsals that the soprano (she's only in part 2, yet to be uploaded) was getting lost in the orchestra. I would have done the audio much better if I had more time to setup and a way to get all the kit into the site. It was a fair distance from the nearest car park and I was working solo.As it turned out thanks to the acoustics of the church and me being in the front row it wasn't too bad. The organist was playing too quiet on the day. Getting the "mix" right is quite a challenge for the organist and conductor. Keeping it all in time and tune is another issue. The lead violin is in tune, just to a different tuning than the organ, yish, even I could hear that.

It was fun making this. Ever since I was a young nipper and my grandfather would take me to the afternoon recitals of the Sydney Town Hall organ I've had a thing for pipe organs, might also account for my love of heavy metal bands :). Getting to stand under the ranks of this smaller pipe organ while it was being played was quite an experience.

Bob.

[edit] I should mention the client / conductor is now a Vegas user, bought a copy of VMS on my recommendation.
craftech wrote on 12/26/2008, 8:58 PM
I really liked this piece Bob. The lighting was perfect in my opinion. I wouldn't trade that for a lighting kit at all. The shots from the rehearsals blended very well. I do that all the time to simulate a multi-cam shoot. You did a great job.

John
UlfLaursen wrote on 12/26/2008, 10:35 PM
Very nice indeed, Bob. :-)

Both light and sound is absolutly great.

/Ulf
Grazie wrote on 12/26/2008, 10:38 PM
Having only the light available to you, you shot this very well indeed. As you mentioned, I did see some colour jumps on the "socked-feet" B-roll.

I could add some editing comments here, but I wont. As a thought, I would have preferred to have the camera a little higher - I found the conductor's back-view tended to ultimately dominate the action in-front of him?

Overall I liked the framing with the stained glass taking a nicely proportioned domination of the upper third - nice.

As has been said, the audio was very clear and didn't hide any extraneous notes at all.

Grazie

apit34356 wrote on 12/26/2008, 11:17 PM
Nice work Farss! ;-) I probably follow Grazie position. I like sweeping shots, but reality like money and time controls a lot of "can-do's" . But your shots are clear and bright, and the sound is good. Very nice work, especially being "upside down" down-under . ;-)
Soniclight wrote on 12/27/2008, 3:56 AM
Hey, Bob, nice job. Crispness came through, in both sound and music as others have said. The only thing I'd have done differently is to have used softer cross-fades between wide and closer-up shots.

But then I'm kind of hooked to that soft-flow stuff. And my style is very different.
So what do I know... Nuttin' :o)