O/ Broadcast Vans or Vegas/Firestore/Bella?

PeterWright wrote on 7/21/2006, 7:30 PM
I am involved on an upcoming project to be shot over 13 weeks, mainly at a golf course - not all round the course, but at a "set" to be built on the practice range.

They are proposing to use a live to tape mix (maybe 4-5 cameras) by hiring an outside broadcast van. I want to put an alternative proposal to shoot each cam straight to disc, using maybe Firestore ot the upcoming Bella Catapult, then doing a multi camera edit in Vegas, using Excalibur or Ultimatte S. There will be at least a week from shoot to broadcast, but the straight to disk for all cams would save lots of capturing time!

I think I can save them lots of money this way, but before I go off at half-cock I would love to hear from anyone with experience of these devices - how reliable, how easy to link to PC afterwards etc.

Comments

[r]Evolution wrote on 7/21/2006, 8:10 PM
ALWAYS capture to Tape also!
PeterWright wrote on 7/21/2006, 8:20 PM
> "ALWAYS capture to Tape also!"

Yes - I didn't mention this, but it'd definitely be a belt and braces approach ...

Incidentally - if a Firestore or other device records for three hours and a tape has to be changed every hour - is it possible to keep recording with the Firestore whilst changing tapes?
Spot|DSE wrote on 7/21/2006, 8:50 PM
You can set up the firestore to be independent of recording from tape so you can record while changing tapes, but it's a jam start, not a record button/synced start. While we still always shoot to tape, we end up using the HDD in all situations. No dropouts ever, with HDD.

It's a tough call, what you're proposing. As much as I'd like to say you could be nearly as fast, you can't. A switcher can beat an NLE any day of the week, but as you've noted, the downside is that you're stuck with what the director called for the switcher. With NLE, you have options at all times. We've done a couple events as you're describing, based around regional moto X, and I know the client was much happier with what we did vs what he's gotten from a small production truck. Our cost was somewhat less, but the quality was definitely a lot higher, only because there were always choices.
On a fast computer, you can run Vegas at double or 2.5 times normal speed and still get reasonably accurate multicam points, which is probably my standard "always" format for this sort of work. If I'm off by a tad, I can see that immediately during normal speed playback once the master track is assembled.
PeterWright wrote on 7/21/2006, 9:20 PM
Thanks Spot - yes, a live switch would definitely be quicker, but this doesn't have to be that quick - I figured it may take up to a day to do the multi cam edit in Vegas, which would be in plenty of time. (Final Broadcast time around 50 mins, of which the shoot would occupy maybe 35-40 min)

Costing vary wildly, and there are so many staff/equipment variables, but an O/B van could easily be A$5,000 for a day, on top of camera ops, who would be involved either way.

Even if they do decide to go the live switch way, there would still be the possibility of improving the Director's cut from camera tapes, but that would still involve more fiddly post production time.

Even if I charged $1,000 for each edit (which I won't), possible rough comparison of costs apart from camera ops could be:

Outside Broadcast Van Method
13 x $5,000 + final edit (?$300) = $68,900

Vegas Edit Method
Purchase 5 x Firestores/Spare Batteries etc $10,000
13 x 1 day edits $13,000
Total $23,000 including asset of 5 Firestores.

Anyway, next pre-production meet isn't for a couple of weeks, so I'm collecting ammo!

Peter



Spot|DSE wrote on 7/21/2006, 9:32 PM
I think you're grossly undervaluing yourself, but that's based on our rates. No way would we touch a project like this for triple the rates you've posted above. If you can make your nut on that sort of rate, that's exceptionally inexpensive.
Only 5kAU per day for a truck?? That's only around 3800.00 USD, and that is ridiculously cheap for any kind of a truck in the US, anyway. I dunno what trucks in Oz cost, as I've never hired one, but at 5K a day, I hope your production teams never want to move to the USA. :-)
apit34356 wrote on 7/21/2006, 11:08 PM
PeterWright, I would definely reconsider your rates, using DSE advice. One important point in planning, backup equipment! Your should consider having one or two extra Firestores encase of in field failures,( must keep production going).
farss wrote on 7/21/2006, 11:33 PM
If nothing else I'd be seriously questioning just what sort of 'truck' they're getting at those prices. When someone says 'OB' van to me that usually means broadcast cameras with triax or fibre back to the truck and $5K per day wouldn't cover petrol and coffee. Plus you need a lot of bods just to man the van.

Of course the word 'broadcast' gets used pretty loosly so it could be a bunch of old cameras and a composite vision mixer with a S-VHS deck.

So I'd also be perhaps pitching your spiel at better quality as well.

Bob.
Grazie wrote on 7/21/2006, 11:36 PM
Blunt as ever Bob - Love it!

"Of course the word 'broadcast' gets used pretty loosly so it could be a bunch of old cameras and a composite vision mixer with a S-VHS deck."
Marco. wrote on 7/22/2006, 12:02 AM
What about using Newtek's Toaster for this kind of purpose. You'd get the advantages of a switcher and a NLE in one suite.

Marco

Steve Mann wrote on 7/22/2006, 12:28 AM
I agree with Spot. If your bid comes in too far below the competition, then it will likely be tossed out without discussion.

If they are ready to spend $50K for the "live truck", then they may jump at the chance to get better editing within their time constraints for a mere $35K.

We have a couple of "truck" event shooters here (usually retired broadcast shooters who bought used VHS gear ten years ago) and they try to tell the client that it takes weeks to edit a three or four camera project on the PC. Well, maybe it takes *them* weeks to edit with their Version 1.0 of Adobe Premiere, but you can probably bang out the edit in a day or two - max.

Heck, at $35K per shoot, you can afford to fly me to Oz to assist.... (Hint, hint, nod, nod)

Steve M.
farss wrote on 7/22/2006, 12:32 AM
Good suggestion but I think there's a number of other factors to consider.
In general the big boys with their expensive 'vans' find it way cheaper and easier to do a live mix.
Firstly for 8 hours of coverage you've got kit and crew tied up for say 1 day, maybe another day or two max to polish it up, typically one or two cameras will also be recorded to give some room for fudging in post. Thing is though at the end of the day it's pretty well in the bag.

Now recording all cameras and coming away with a bunch of tapes.
Well firstly one assumes the director is going to want to see what those cameras are shooting and be able to bark directions to the cameramen. So we're still talking a bunch of cabling, comms and monitors during the shoot.

Now in post, even recording to HDD that's a heck of a lot of data and presumable it's got to offloaded from the cameras HDD before the next day and even with 1394 running flat out that amount of footage will take time. Having got all that data ingested it's got to be edited and presumably the director is going to want to direct. Will he be happy with what Ultimate S etc can offer? I'd be more than happy but I doubt the average directorial type would be. He'll want full frame rate from all cameras, each on a separate monitor and one for the output of the switcher. Plus he'll want instant playback of the cuts.
So you could be looking at a serious Avid setup with multiroll and they cost by the hour.
Furthermore I'd factor in a bunch of cash for the aggro factor, spending a few weeks with a director and possibly other hangers on doesn't sound that attractive to me. You need space, furniture and facilities.

Of course if this is a charity / community service gig things might be a little different...or not.

Bob.
PeterWright wrote on 7/22/2006, 2:32 AM
Thanks for all the comments - good to have a discussion about topics like this.

The figures I quoted (guessed at) above were only referring to that part of the budget which would be affected by doing a "Vegas Multi-Cam" instead of live mix. The total budget for the 13 part series is around A$1m, and includes executive producer, managing director,
producer, director, crew, talent, etc, etc. At the moment my role is "Associate Editor" - exact job description yet to be finalised, but I know the boss lady wants to have me around because she trusts me, which suggests there may be others she doesn't.

Good point about the director Bob, although I've worked with him before and he knows I'm a class act!! ;) Regarding any reservations about software preview - I think I can get past that by use of Ram renders occasionally, and I'm currently working on a demo Opening Title sequence to show 'em what Vegas can do. I doubt very much he'll be looking over my shoulder all the time - more likely "Call me when you've done the first cut"
Each shoot should produce 2-3 hours footage, times however many cameras they use. The Firestores won't generally be needed till the following week, so I could either edit straight from them, or dump the footage to a F/W HD - I see they can do 4x transfer, so 45 mins per cam wouldn't be too bad, and I could maybe do 3 or 4 cams at a time if I dump to separate Hard Drives.

Anyway, I'll see what happens - the "powers" are over your side of Oz at the moment Bob, doing deals, and they may have already decided how they want to go by the time they return in a fortnight. I just like to let them knoiw there are alternatives ....