OT: Cedar Versus NR2 etc, SPOT?

farss wrote on 10/28/2004, 3:34 PM
I know this belongs in the audio or SF forum but I also know SPOT has one of these units so hopefully he can give me an independant evaluation.
What I'm getting more into is archival retrieval and would like to be able to do the best possible job. I use NR2 a lot for what it excels at, removing natural noise. However given how it works I don't believe it's of much use on unnatural noise, things like tape hiss etc. The click removal tools do seem to work well for what they were designed for though.
So I'm giving some thought to the Cedar but I have two reservations about them.
Firstly they require analogue feeds and much of this material is already digitised and the analogue sources long lost. I don't think going through a D->A->D->A->D pass is going to do much for the material!
Secondly, I don't need RT performance, so the same thing as a software tool should be able to do a better job and cost less.
I've listened to a bit of 'Digitally Remastered' material lately, just my spin on this, but I think I would have preferred they'd left it alone, the shifting level of tape hiss is more distracting than it would have been in the original recording!
Any advice or thoughts much appreciated and again my apologies for putting this in the 'wrong' place.

Bob.

Comments

Spot|DSE wrote on 10/28/2004, 3:58 PM
Actually, I don't own a Cambridge/Cedar any longer. Sold it on ebay a while back.
that should tell you how I feel about Sony NR. The only place I think Cedar belongs is in a livecast recording. In our studio, nothing is live, it's all production. Cedar has some nice warming tools in there too, but frankly...So does Vegas with the right plugs. Add Ozone or SonicTimeworx, plus NR, and you're THERE. For a fraction of the cost.
farss wrote on 10/29/2004, 2:58 PM
Thanx,
the cost of the Cedar units is certainly staggering, if it'd perform any magic that cannot be done any other way I'd pony up for it but if it does the same thing but just in RT then it's pointless for my line of work.
I'll looking the other tools that you've suggested.
Bob.