OT: i7 system?

Serena wrote on 3/4/2010, 8:49 PM
A few days ago there was a thread in which people mentioned their system specs (processors, MB, ram, etc) but I can't find it. Surely that one didn't get stroppy? I'm starting to look at the upgrade question and I thought that information about effective systems would be good guidance. Anyone know which thread that was? I searched for i7 over the last 6 months (I expected 5 days to be sufficient) and returned nothing like it. I've chosen people at random but either I've been unlucky or they haven't updated their system specs.

Comments

xberk wrote on 3/4/2010, 9:37 PM
A number of current specs can be found at the end of this thread.

John Cline's Render Test

I'm running i5-750 with 8 gigs of Ram under Win7 64 bit. Smooth machine.

Paul B .. PCI Express Video Card: EVGA VCX 10G-P5-3885-KL GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 ULTRA ,,  Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor ,,  MSI Z590-A PRO Desktop Motherboard LGA-1200 ,, 64GB (2X32GB) XPG GAMMIX D45 DDR4 3200MHz 288-Pin SDRAM PC4-25600 Memory .. Seasonic Power Supply SSR-1000FX Focus Plus 1000W ,, Arctic Liquid Freezer II – 360MM .. Fractal Design case ,, Samsung Solid State Drive MZ-V8P1T0B/AM 980 PRO 1TB PCI Express 4 NVMe M.2 ,, Wundiws 10 .. Vegas Pro 19 Edit

ushere wrote on 3/4/2010, 9:50 PM
hi (beardless) serena,

i remember the thread too, however, no idea where it went.

i'm running i7/920, 6gb ram with both 32/64bit vegas, and other than the odd (well documented) vegas bug here and there, it's a joy. fast, smooth, and great rendering in 64bit.

that said, most of my work is pretty simple, though i do use cc'ing, txt / lower thirds, a few fx, and some p in p, and a fair amount of ken burns on png's - all of which go smoothly enough.

for clients i've chopped avchd on the t/l (though i prefer encoding to mxf), and done some pretty tacky fx with no problems.

all that said, i always try and make my media vegas compatible....

leslie

btw - gigabyte m/b - ex58 ud3r / nvidia geforce 9600gt
JackW wrote on 3/4/2010, 10:35 PM
Hi Serena: Is this the link you're looking for?

I'm about to upgrade too and have been interested in the i7 as well.

Jack
Serena wrote on 3/4/2010, 10:47 PM
Those threads are useful and certainly pertinent to the subject, but not the exact thread. The one I remember mentioned the MB (for a moment I thought xberk's system), but I'm just being lazy and should do my research in the computer reviews. Not being computer-savvy I tend to follow whatever others find successful.
UlfLaursen wrote on 3/4/2010, 11:19 PM
I have the Asus P6T motherboard in my i7 system, and I have seen others having this or a viriant of it. So far it has been good to me with 12 GB RAM W7 64 and 9.0C 64

/Ulf
Serena wrote on 3/5/2010, 12:44 AM
Thanks UlfLaursen.
PeterDuke wrote on 3/5/2010, 1:40 AM
I have just upgraded to Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R MB for i7-920 and 12 GB DDR3 RAM in preparation for AVCHD editing, but so far have only hacked SD DV AVI. (A sledge hammer to crack a walnut!)

64 bit Windows 7 and Vegas 9c .

Rendering is about 4 times faster than my old rig. I haven't tried adding still images to the project yet. No problems so far, but I am prepared to go back to 32 bit Vegas and or 9b or even 8c when necessary.
akwaaba wrote on 3/5/2010, 1:58 AM
Hi
just a suggestion Google videoguys diy 7 for some really good ideas as a start point.

Good luck with your search

Chris
JohnnyRoy wrote on 3/5/2010, 6:20 AM
> ...just a suggestion Google videoguys diy 7 for some really good ideas as a start point.

Yea Serena, the Videoguys DIY7 seems to be is the system that most people are building around. It has the Asus P6T Deluxe V2 motherboard, an Intel Core i7 920, and 12GB of memory. You can't go wrong building this system and the parts are listed so you really can't go wrong if you buy the same part numbers.

~jr
Jan_Cannon wrote on 3/5/2010, 8:24 AM
I have that same basic set up and it's fantastic. I'm editing 5D Mark II footage using Cineform Neo HD for a codec. One thing to keep in mind is how easy it is to overclock the i7 920 processor. I am running mine at 3.8GHz without any problems. You have to have good cooling though. A good site for overclocking (for beginers, like me) is at: http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/overclocking/22106-core-i7-overclocking-guide-beginners.html
Serena wrote on 3/5/2010, 2:18 PM
Yes, indeed, thanks That DIY system looks good and designed for the task (and tested!). Hard to beat a proven recipe!
Yoyodyne wrote on 3/5/2010, 2:31 PM
I'm using pretty much the same set up as the Videoguys DIY system. I am having an issue with the Gspeed ES though and Gspeed tech support is not very responsive. I did call Videoguys tech support and they actually answer the phone! Not a ton of help though, they guy seemed to think that I am not running Windows 7 - 64 bit..... the only problem being I AM running Windows 7 - 64 bit.

Been to busy to play around with it but so far that's been my only hickup.
Hulk wrote on 3/5/2010, 7:34 PM
I would suggest the i860 over the i920 cpu. The slightly decreased memory bandwidth won't make a difference with video editing performance where GHz rules. The mobo is cheaper with the i860 and the chip out of the box is faster. Plus it has the advantage of the turbo modes for apps that don't utilize all 8 cores.

If you were a gamer or used some other app that could use the memory bandwidth I'd say the 920 would be the way to go but not for video editing.

Of course the 920 based systems are great too so you can't go wrong either way. You can just get a little more pop for your dollar with the i860 in my opinion.

- Mark
bsuratt wrote on 3/5/2010, 7:41 PM
<<videoguys diy 7>>

For the same money you can buy essentially the same computer from (Dell Studio XPS 9000) and not take a gamble on consumer grade boards and components put together with "mix and match" engineering! Oh, and that includes a 23' Dell Monitor.




Serena wrote on 3/5/2010, 7:45 PM
Been looking through suppliers and checking reviews and see that the 920 has been replaced by the 930, which then sent me off checking MBs for compatibility (the Asus P6TD Deluxe). Stuff changes so quickly in this field that it is quite daunting to try to match any existing system. The i860? I'll look at that.
Tom Pauncz wrote on 3/5/2010, 9:00 PM
I, too, am totally satisfied with an i7-860 based system - MoBo is an Asus P7P55D Pro.

See system #1 spec in my profile. 8 cores are just great.

Tom
Serena wrote on 3/5/2010, 9:28 PM
I didn't realise we can put more than 1 system in our profile....how about that? Intel say the i860 is discontinued and I note that the 930 has the same basic clock speed as the 860. Really hums with over-clocking, but I don't know enough to start down that path.
Serena wrote on 3/7/2010, 7:00 PM
Interesting. In computing how would one know that the chip doesn't match the label? Anyway the i920 is out of date.
amendegw wrote on 3/8/2010, 4:08 AM
"Interesting. In computing how would one know that the chip doesn't match the label? Anyway the i920 is out of date."In this particular case, if you watch the YouTube in the link above, you will see that the CPU's in question had no pins - a dead giveaway *grin*.

In a more general nature, (if the chip could be installed) you could go to start->programs->Accessories->System Tools->System Information:



...Jerry

System Model:     Alienware M18 R1
System:           Windows 11 Pro
Processor:        13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13980HX, 2200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s)

Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter:  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 566.14 Nov 2024
Overclock Off

Display:          1920x1200 240 hertz
Storage (8TB Total):
    OS Drive:       NVMe KIOXIA 4096GB
        Data Drive:     NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO 4TB
        Data Drive:     Glyph Blackbox Pro 14TB

Vegas Pro 22 Build 239

Cameras:
Canon R5 Mark II
Canon R3
Sony A9