OT: Interesting new DVD Copy Protection

Jsnkc wrote on 11/2/2005, 8:03 AM
New DVD watermark has pirates in its sights

Hollywood has unveiled a powerful new technology which it hopes will help kill the pirating of movies. The system relies on sound – not vision – and was unveiled at a conference held by the international DVD Forum in Paris, France last week.

The opportunity for a novel copyright protection system arose because the Forum is now finalising the standards for the new High Definition DVD system that goes on sale early in 2006. The details of the system were explained by Alan Bell, executive vice-president of advanced technology with Warner Brothers in California, US.

All HD-DVD players will have a sensor that looks for inaudible watermarks in the soundtrack of movies. The watermarks will be included in the soundtracks of all major movies released to cinemas.

If a DVD player detects the telltale code, the disc must be an illegal copy made by copying a film print to video, or pointing a camcorder and microphone at a cinema screen. So the player refuses to play the disc.

Subtle variations
The mark is made by slightly varying the waveform of speech and music in a regular pattern to convey a digital code. The variations are too subtle to be noticeable to the human ear, but are easily recognised by the decoder in the player.

A variation of the system can also prevent the playback of discs made by pointing a camcorder at a home screen while it is playing a legitimate disc sold to individual consumers.

The consumer discs will also have an audio watermark, which differs from the cinema mark. If an HD-DVD player senses the consumer watermark it will check whether the disc is a legal, factory-pressed version and, if not, shut down.

Children’s parties
Alan Bell believes the DVD Forum has done all it can to prevent foul-ups. “We know that there might be a Hollywood movie in the background during a children’s party, and if Dad takes a home movie the watermark might end up on the sound track,” he says. “So the player will only shut down if it is continuous for quite a long time.”

Fred von Lohmann, an intellectual property attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, California, says: “Few may object if you're only talking about the blue-laser DVD drives, but the trouble with watermarking schemes is the scope of the technology."

"For any watermarking scheme to be effective, technology companies have to be forced to re-engineer playback devices to detect the watermarks," he told New Scientist. "The risk is that Hollywood starts dictating the redesign of existing DVD drives, CD drives, hard drives, and personal computers, all to buttress the watermark."



source

Comments

RBartlett wrote on 11/2/2005, 8:59 AM
Normalise filters used in post might also be reactive enough to cancel this out. Maybe even a compressor/limiter might slew the peak enough to remove the fingerprinting signal.

I wouldn't like to handle the returned equipment if the period of sensing wasn't accidentally set too short. False positives are something we are all witness to at some point.

Always good to hear new ideas and HD really is the point in our history where Hollywood gives out its crown jewels. Even if the bitrate is little more than 28Mbps peak at the start. Eventually we won't need to use compression technologies if we stick to just one film per shiny disc. 3 digit gigabyte discs are likely to arrive during the life of HD media production. We just don't have a DVD-Video type name for them yet, AFAIK.

I think the idea of detecting autofocus infrared at the projection screen, without the employees knowing - is a reasonable way to count these things. Also, unlike DVD, watermarking the video or audio to identify the reel would seem possible, given that the creation of film prints is a photographic process, and this lends itself to an identification technology.

Bad people will copy and sell, good people will copy and use/share amongst themselves. Yet there needs to be some acceptance that some human activity will affect profits. A bad review of what is a good film can have a tremendous change to the overall return of investment for a film maker. Indie film makers would love to have their films copied and shared. If it gave them the exposure they desired, perhaps they would then make money on the next time around. Merchandise is Hollywood's last hope perhaps.

Otherwise we'll end up with BluRay or HD-DVD protocols that require us to use cell phones to text a public key hash back to the film studio to then enter the unlock key into the player. With a protection scheme that then makes us all feel like villains even when we've bought the film. Suits microsoft, might suit Hollywood by the time 4K uncompressed TruHD comes out (I made that up, BTW).
Coursedesign wrote on 11/2/2005, 9:33 AM
3 digit gigabyte discs are likely to arrive during the life of HD media production. We just don't have a DVD-Video type name for them yet, AFAIK.

Umm, HVDs (Holographic Video Discs) may appear as early as next year (2006), with initially 200GB of storage, growing to Terabytes later.

If the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray squabble doesn't result in a clear winner, HVD may just honk its horn and pass them both by.

TheHappyFriar wrote on 11/2/2005, 9:48 AM
interesting, but it does bring up a REALLY good point: if you video tape ANYTHING that has that "code" in the audio the DVD won't play. That could mean even if you video tape a news report about the next summer blockbuster, it won't play on your DVD player because the camera/mic picked up a little bit ofthe audio comming through the theature doors causing the copy protection to kick in.

I'd prefer a visual way honestly. SD cameras (which most people have & still buy) record TV's/Projections like crap, so if you video takes your kids birthday party with "Aladin" in the background, aladian would be unreconizable but the video of your child would still be good.

B.Verlik wrote on 11/2/2005, 11:07 AM
I don't like any of it. As a musician, I meet people from all walks of life. From good to bad. I've yet to meet a single person who's trying to sell a bootlegged video of anything, even porn. Now I do make backup copies of my favorite movies. (and that's about 3 movies) But they don't even get loaned out. (or watched by me, as I'm sick of my favorite movies)
The people that buy these bootlegs probably have the worst equipment to watch them on, thus making these "perfect" copies only so-so resolution. I can't imagine anyone with decent equipment going out of their way to buy bootlegged copies or rent DVDs to rip. I'm sure there are some who do, but I'm still waiting to hear of anybody selling these things. So only the worst neighborhoods must be getting these, and I doubt their TVs, DVD players, audio systems can get the best out of these copies. And that makes the copy, sub-par. In other words, there has to be very few people who actually rip DVDs and Music and know how to get the best quality on playback, that rip all the time. And I'll also bet, most who know what they're doing, are too afraid to try to sell any. Not all, but most.
The bums that buy these copies, would never shell out for the regular "official" release and they usually don't shell out for anything but the worst equipment to watch it on too. So they end up watching these things on TVs with a screen that's practically the shape of a globe. A DVD player that can't keep the audio sync'd with the picture. If plugged into an audio system, it's a tiny, crappy everything-in-one tinny sounding system or just the speakers on the TV. In other words: WHO CARES, besides some money grubbing bigwigs who count fractions of a fraction of a cent!
Personally, if I really like a movie, I'd have to own a regular release of it. A ripped copy wouldn't cut it for me. It doesn't matter if the quality is just as good, I'd have to own the box, the extras, and the official disc. I wouldn't be happy otherwise. Same with music too. I'm proud to buy the official release. (Providing it doesn't have any malware on it.)
ottowr wrote on 11/2/2005, 6:15 PM
There are already watermark schemes in use on audio discs.

http://www.activatedcontent.com/

These survive almost any processing. Basically by the time you've manged to destrioy the watermark, there won't be much musical content left. They survive 48k mp3, and taping from AM radio.