Comments

Grazie wrote on 1/20/2008, 1:09 AM
Nope! Same here .. been meaning to get off my bottom and wang them an email. I read early '08. Well I suppose that's like up to the end of the 1st Qtr? yeah?

Tell me, under what circumstances would you/I want to do a 4-channel RX repair? - Just interested to know what more I can squeeze out of this amazing product.

Grazie
Grazie wrote on 1/20/2008, 1:11 AM
Oh . . In the last 48 hours I did an IzoRx repair to some quick n nasty webcam mic work I did. Rx was brilliant.
MarkFoley wrote on 1/20/2008, 2:12 AM
I typically record in 4 channel mono and it doesn't recognize that type of .wav file.
Grazie wrote on 1/20/2008, 3:20 AM
So, that is why you want 4-channels, understood. But why are wanting then to repair 4 channels? Typically, what would your project be?
MarkFoley wrote on 1/20/2008, 4:02 AM
if a glitch (unwanted external noise) is heard across all four channels or to a single channel...now I have to render the problem channel and fix it in RX...then drop it back in place. Like to eliminate those extra steps and do it withing vegas at the specific track level
Grazie wrote on 1/20/2008, 4:58 AM
Ah! Right! Got it . .

Also, could the plugin work as per theior great EQ, Compressor & Reverb? I presently use these to great affect in the new Vegas Mixer, and I can now really see the advantage of the same WITH an IzoRx plugin. AND not needing to render - just yet!

Actually, I did recently have 2 cameras with the 2x2 = 4 audio channels. And I found I needed all of these to balance out the "best".

And crucially it was here I used RX to remove some nasty hum. And THEN I needed to substitute the rendered-out IzoRx and use this against the "other" camera's video. Now, as you say, having the plugin option would have made this far FAR simpler!!

What a Forum! What people! Mark thank you.


Kennymusicman wrote on 1/20/2008, 5:06 AM
No need to send the m an email. Soon is the answer :)

MarkFoley wrote on 1/20/2008, 5:56 AM
within a few weeks kenny?