Well, this is sort of OT, but we will all start to deal with this as time goes forward (or maybe we already do and I'm just slow on the uptake.)
I'm shooting and editing a piece for a tradeshow that will be played on a progressive 16x9 LCD screen. This is the first time that I've known for sure what sort of TV set my work will be displayed on. I'm bringing in a more experienced cameraman to help with grip duties and DP. His main camera these days (over a 2/3 Betacam) is the Panny DVX100.
My question is: should we shoot "widescreen" in-camera (electronic anamorphic compress - not letterbox), do something in post to get the 4:3 footage to display correctly in 16:9 land, or let the LCD TV pillar box the footage and deal with chopped sides. (or, get the client to get a hold of a 4:3 LCD?)
Which would yield the best results? I bet keeping the footage in its native 4:3 would be best.
(p.s. should I dabble in the 24p of the DVX or just stick with 30i?)
Thanks in advance.
Jeff
I'm shooting and editing a piece for a tradeshow that will be played on a progressive 16x9 LCD screen. This is the first time that I've known for sure what sort of TV set my work will be displayed on. I'm bringing in a more experienced cameraman to help with grip duties and DP. His main camera these days (over a 2/3 Betacam) is the Panny DVX100.
My question is: should we shoot "widescreen" in-camera (electronic anamorphic compress - not letterbox), do something in post to get the 4:3 footage to display correctly in 16:9 land, or let the LCD TV pillar box the footage and deal with chopped sides. (or, get the client to get a hold of a 4:3 LCD?)
Which would yield the best results? I bet keeping the footage in its native 4:3 would be best.
(p.s. should I dabble in the 24p of the DVX or just stick with 30i?)
Thanks in advance.
Jeff