OT: What will 2006 bring us?

p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 12:20 PM
Touched on in another thread, 2006 is shaping up to be hopefully a very promising year in the multimedia/video world.

2006 is the year when we will see the first MacTel machines that will be capable of running not only OSX and Mac software, but Windows code bases as well in a dual boot enviornment. One thing for sure is that we wont be quick to see major price drops any time soon. Still, one must admit that having the ability to dual boot between Mac OSX and Windows XP/Vista will be a treat and its about time that Apple give their users more for their money than just over priced hardware. For those that want to give FCP a try, this is a no brainer. Perhaps this move will inspire all the major NLEs to work together to find a way to allow projects to be switched and used in other NLEs more stabily.

Just as last year, the big buzz word was HD. We saw many announcements from companys offering HDV cameras, HD content, to NLEs playing catch up with Vegas and offering HDV editing.I am willing to bet that HD will once again be the buzz word of 2006 only on a much much larger scale.

The obvious thing that 2006 will be the long awaited yet over hyped Blu Ray and HD-DVD. Over hyped in the sense that we keep hearing about the technology and studios and companies supporting it, but for someone who doesnt own a multimillion dollar corporation, getting a look at one of the devices and the content on the discs, it is borderline vaporware. The big battle this year will be between who can actually get consumer devices out first. While HD-DVD lacks the space that Blu Ray offers, it is more than made up from H.264 AVC and VC-1 codecs.

Speaking of H.264 AVC and VC-1, that in itself positions itself as a battle. While both codecs are already supported in both camps, the various developers of H.264 AVC and its companies will wage war against MS and its VC-1 codec. Who will win out? Both offer excellent quality so royalties may play a major role in companies adoptions to authoring. We shall see.

I expect huge things this year for NLEs and the upcoming HD craze. Vegas has always been a front runner on the cutting edge when it supports new technologies. I remember when Vegas was the first and to my knowledge, the ONLY NLE that supported Vorbis audio. Companies like Avid and Adobe, have sat quietly in the past while Vegas paved the way. Nonetheless, will Sony be the first out of the gate to support Hi Def authoring with its Vegas7/DVDA4 line? My sources say, unfortunately, NO. Adobe is heavily rumored to be launching a total complete Hi Def authoring solution early in 2006. Not fear though, once Adobe releases thier collection, surely it will be a long time before any new and old bugs are fixed from previous versions. However, like HD-DVD and Blu Ray, first to market might be enough to provde the advantage even if only temporary.

I also expect 2006 to not only bring HD set tops and players but even more portable devices. The PSP and Ipod created the "video to go" craze that doesnt seem to be ending any time in the future. I expect Sony to either release a bigger PSP with a larger screen and to finally unlock the entire resolution and even add a hard drive to combat Apple's onslaught. Apple is sure to not only offer bigger screens but larger hard drives as well.

I think 2006 could possibly be the death of MiniDV/SD editing. Sony offered lower priced HDV cameras which should only come down in price through the year and possibly position itself as a must have Christmas gift of 2006. While companies like Canon and Pansonic finally enter the mix, it still looks to be 2-3 years before they can begin to compete with Sony on the consumer HDV level.

I also expect piracy to continue at alarming rates. Directly in its crosshairs will be the proection schemes of the new HD devices. If any of the backers of the technologies were smart, they would hire DVD John and pay him a crap load of money so he doesnt bust their protection in the first couple weeks or months. Otherwise, all this talk of managed and protected content was for nothing leaving consumers footing the bills for companies and their failures to succeed in winning an unwinnable war.

WRT to online content, I believe 2006 holds the serious possiblities that Indy filmers focus on the net for a main means of distribution. Apple is positioning itself to sell videos of music and TV shows and one can be sure that movies arent that far behind. But for your indy filmers, competing with the big boys (studios) will prove to be quite as difficult and will turn to the net to make their sales. The porn industry has proven that there is a demand for online delivery of content, abeit a controversial and lack of video quality one. With faster pipes to the net in every household, IPTV and the like will surely enjoy increase use and exposure.

I personally think by next Chrstimas, HD sets will be so saturated in the market, that we will see them for $200-$300. Maybe thats too optimistic but consumers will have to have something to lay their new HD content that will surely be marketed and shoved down their throats this year. The smartest thing a company could do right now would be to flood the marketplace with lower cost items to gain as much marketshare as you can.

While I am sure there are many other things I have overlooked or missed, 2006 is shaping up to be one of the most exciting years for multimedia. Whether it be on the web, cell phones, portable players, or set top players, their will be a major need for content and that definitely bodes well for all in the video/entertainment industry.

Happy New Year and Video Editing in 2006.

P.S. I reserve the right to be wrong on some or all of my predicitons but I'll bet I am right more than I am wrong. :)

Comments

Coursedesign wrote on 12/28/2005, 2:18 PM
I personally think by next Christmas, HD sets will be so saturated in the market, that we will see them for $200-$300. Maybe thats too optimistic...

They descended through the $500 barrier recently.

Real HD on a real LCD TV, and decent picture too.

You are absolutely, positively not too optimistic here.

I would guess next summer at the latest.

FCP is designed with a closed architecture, with Apple jealously working hard to prevent anybody else from adding too much functionality to it without Apple's blessing (and a stream of royalties). Vegas scripts, great PP add-ons? No way.
I see nothing special about FCP except its ability to work with celluloid film matchback at a low price point. As this is replaced by DI (Digital Intermediate) everywhere, this is rapidly becoming obsolete.

Yeah, the new PP will probably make news real good. Ditto AE which has even fixed the UI goofs from the past. I suspect AE will take another bite out of Combustion's market share except at the high end (as Autodesk has fallen into a deep sleep).

The content protection/piracy war will be won shortly after the drug war has been won.

When is that?

Soon after the paperless office has been introduced.

I remember a top honcho at Xerox telling me in 1980 that the new Xerox 8010 "Star" computer (GUI with desktop metaphor and mouse) was the beginning of the paperless office.

I immediately thought we'll have paperless bathrooms before we have paperless offices, and that still rings true 25 years later.
p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 2:40 PM
Paperless office? Not in our lifetimes LOL. Think of all the trees we would save? Surely corporate America couldnt have that now. LOL.

I am a bit intrigued by the Mactel systems. Not so much because I think that FCP does stuff that Vegas cant but more so just for the experience. Plus up til now, MS really didnt have a major competitor on the x386 platform. One could say Linux, but Linux is still a ways away from our point and click generation. Hopefully the Apple move will inspire MS to meet deadlines and begin to innovate. Otherwise, you can bet Apple will do everything to exploit that and try to draw a bigger share of the desktop market. I can see the slogan now :Apple: One computer, all solutions".

The thing I look forward to the most from the mactel would the ability to use Motion and Shake.
winrockpost wrote on 12/28/2005, 2:50 PM
$500 hd tv,, how about a $500 HDV cam,, what a ya think Nostradamus ?
p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:04 PM
$500 HDV cam would be mighty fine with me. Id buy three or four if they ever became that cheap. MMMMmmmm. Multicam HDV. can only imagine the possiblities.
farss wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:12 PM
I think the MacTel poses a bigger threat to Apple than anyone else.
Firstly it strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Macolite, you're no longer part of a unique sect, just another Joe Blo with an Intel box running an arcane OS like the Linux mob.
But secondly there's nothing holding you back from running anything, even Vegas or PP. Worse still there's little reason for developers to release OSX and Windows versions if the client bas only has to boot a different OS to run the app. Don't be surprised to see Adobe ditch PS for OSX.
On the other side of the coin if you own a non MacTel box then (in theory) the only way you can run OSX and it's application suite is to buy a new box.
So the move has made it very easy for a Macolite to move to the dark side, it's made it no easier for the reverse to happen. Very risky move on Apples part.
And in the wierdest twist of all uStuff have shown themselves to be adept at writing code for the platform that Apple are abandoning.
Lets also not forget that Adobe have bought Macromedia, the authors of FCP, interesting development.
Adobe with PP now have a product that can handle a full res DI for film out that runs on affordable hardware, that leaves FCPs film matchback capabilities looking kind of irrelevant, big question is when will Vegas be unlocked from its 8 bit shackles.

My own predications for 2006:

Quality will decline further and the majority of us here will become richer as a result.

Bob.
Coursedesign wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:23 PM
Who said Mactel boxes will be capable of dual-boot?

I thought Jobs had stated that this would only happen over his dead body?
p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:28 PM
No. Jobs said he would not port OSX to work on curretn Intel machines. He said he would/could not stop anyone else from running their OS on Mac machines since Intel supports the x386 code base. Jobs also said that OSX could only be installed on a Mac locked machines meaning it has the Mac in the Bios.

I read an interview I believe from MacWorld that said that dual booting on Mactels would be possible but using OSX on a non Mac machine would be over Jobs dead body.
p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:31 PM
"Quality will decline further and the majority of us here will become richer as a result."

Can I get a written guarrantee on that? God knows Id love to be rich.
farss wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:42 PM
Patrick,
I'm no religious guru but that sure sounds like you've taken a mighty fall from Grace. Only the devil gives written warranties.
Bob.
p@mast3rs wrote on 12/28/2005, 3:52 PM
On the contrary, beign rich gives me more opportuntiies to make differences in the community. Kinda hard to raise funds for a new playground at the park than it is if you had the money to donate yourself. Thats all I ever hope to truly accomplish with a decent movie that makes some coin. Enough to provide for my family and to help my community. :)
filmy wrote on 12/28/2005, 4:54 PM
>>>I personally think by next Chrstimas, HD sets will be so saturated in the market, that we will see them for $200-$300.<<<

Next Christmas? How about now. Well - ok, sure not $200 - $300 this second but $300 - $400 for sure. I got a 30 inch Philips for $399 during Black Friday (Of course now the exact same one they are selling for $388). Doing a brief search now I found a 27 inch DynaFlat™ Digital HDTV Monitor for $389.98. J&R has a PANASONIC CT-27HL14 27" HDTV Compatible for $379.99. I am not so sure in there aren't floor models being sold in the $200 - $300 range. I was in some store today and they had a 50 or 51 inch Sony projection HDTV for $999.00.
Steve Mann wrote on 12/28/2005, 9:17 PM
>>>I personally think by next Chrstimas, HD sets will be so saturated in the market, that we will see them for $200-$300.<<<

My prediction:

Blu Ray and HD DVD will be colossal consumer flop and sales of HD televisions will flatten.
Grazie wrote on 12/28/2005, 10:33 PM
I've heard one person say that HD looks like images are that "sharp" that they appear to be cut out and pasted on backgrounds - interesting how the greater public will/wont receive this. My bet is that they wont even know.

Grazie
Yoyodyne wrote on 12/28/2005, 11:27 PM
n19093 makes a good point;

"My prediction:

Blu Ray and HD DVD will be colossal consumer flop and sales of HD televisions will flatten."

I don't know about the sales of HD sets but I think Blu Ray and HD DVD are going to have a huge uphill battle as far as widespread consumer adoption. The problem they face.....

people have already bought the movie on VHS, bought the movie on DVD, bought the DVD directors cut, bought the DVD 20th anniversary edition with special box and new directors commentary, bought the movie on UMD for the Sony PSP...

I just don't know how many times the masses are willing to buy the same flick over and over again - I'm not saying that people won't buy a new HD player and some discs but I know a bunch of people with HUGE DVD libraries that are not that excited about replacing them. The only way people will start to jump on board is if the players are super cheap - and the movies look a lot better on the set they have. All those folks that got that "extended definition" HD plasma set may not see enough of a difference between the new HD stuff and good old mpeg-2 to justify the cost of the new format. I mean a lot of these folks have their DVD player hooked up with the composite connection...
Spot|DSE wrote on 12/28/2005, 11:50 PM
Yoyodyne,
I'm one of those with a huge DVD collection (over 2K titles) and I'm upgrading. I won't buy *all* or even most of those titles again, but I will be buying all new in BD. HD DVD won't gain acceptance soon because there isn't enough market content support for it. BD on the other hand....doesn't suffer that problem.
I'm also smart enough to know that I'm by no means a barometer for the industry, but the analysts who are *usually* right, have it right so far on HD. We'll see what the actual numbers are next March when the Xmas sales #'s are in. I'll bet they're not far off. If they're close, that also should be a good indicator of what will happen in the third and fourth quarter of '06. I don't agree with much of what Patrick is predicting, but it's pretty clear that BD will be a big hit. We'll know more in a week at CES, when we'll see the first demonstrations of BD at the show in several booths.
corug7 wrote on 12/28/2005, 11:57 PM
>>$500 HDV cam would be mighty fine with me. Id buy three or four if they ever became that cheap.<<

Sure. We'll include the new 1/10.2" single ccd.
Yoyodyne wrote on 12/29/2005, 12:09 AM
DSE
I find it hard to believe you have time to watch movies - much less collect em' :)
Spot|DSE wrote on 12/29/2005, 12:18 AM
Movies....yes. That's what airplanes and laptops are good for...also, they can run in the background while working on the flight. Now television...that's a different story. I can't think of the last episodic I got interested in, outside of "Lost," and only had a little interest in that from being on the set and the sound mixer being a friend.
garo wrote on 12/29/2005, 1:05 AM
I must have missed something - what is "BD" ?

//Garo
Grazie wrote on 12/29/2005, 1:33 AM
. . thanks Garo! I didn't want to further add to my mountain of lack of DV education!! Glad you asked - LOL!
garo wrote on 12/29/2005, 2:05 AM
I think they mean Blue (Ray) Disk?

//G.
Padre wrote on 12/29/2005, 2:10 AM
i just want Vegas to support MXF files from the HVX200... then i want an ipod type device with built in dvcproHD codecs, so i can hack afew ipods and use those instead of P2 cards..

Oh and i also want to win lotto and maybe have another baby... practicing is too much fun though...

umm.. 2006..
well to tell u the truth, i have a feeling it wil be the year of "trial and error" as new technologiesa re bought forward and we see teh days of Betacam/vhs again.. new formats, differing media, the "my toy is better than your toy" argument as all major companies bring out their wares...

as for NLEs, i see Avid failing with Liquid.. it has a small following and i doubt ppl are willing to jump ship simply for the avid name.. but youll get afew idiots who will.. i see Matrox putting all their eggs in one basket with the AXIO... bad move to run the PP engine only, but hey its their decision right.. pity the AXIOS almost perfect HW setup is stuck with a tedious and outdated NLE... Tegertting existing Digisuite users was a dumb move.. the potential for more was there...
I see Canopus struggling to push edius with its NX and SP systems.. Canopus have some incredible products out there, but their NLE leaves alot to be desired.. Shame the SP/NX only work with Edius.. Overpriced for specific codecs and an NLE which is trying to take from all the others .... maybe they shoudl have stuck with what worked.. Maybe theyll rethink their support from PP and offer a driver bundle and allow PP to have realtime HDV support.. now THAT woul dbe interesting and it would sell like hotcakes... then again they wouldnt do that.. More likely well see a Matrox TRX100 type HDV unit released within 18 months which suports HDV RT...
I see Avid and FCP bickering as usual.. nothing exciting there.. when FCP releases somethign new, AVID will "unlock" something similar.. same ol' story.. ho hum, seen it all before, and i personally consider AVID and FCP to be overated and overused NLEs which offer nothing more than everything else on the market.

As for Vegas. the only redeeming factor it has is the fact that CPUs and Ram capacities get faster and cheaper.. this is a good thing. The shitty thing is that I dont see Vegas 7 offering all that much more than what it already does.. save for dvcproHD codecs and integration. Wonder if it will need an intermediate conversion for perfomrance purposes... wonder if those intermediates will retain timecode this time round?
How bout some new transitions, like a random frame filter whereby randome frames are selected within a range to act as a flash type effect. or maybe a gradient importation option for the cookie cutter to allow me to import my own gradients and masks and use cookie cutter for those instead of preset dodgy shapes... How bout an auto white balance (i know theres a plug for that, but it doesnt "lock" the WB.. )
How bout direct to cineform capture without the need to purchase anythign else?
How bout using the second display as a preview and then when vegas is not running, RETURN MY DESKTOP icons to where they were...
Only April 2006 will tell...

HW..
cameras actually..
Z1.. nice unit, crap lense, shitty form factor (grip sucks the big one) <got 2 of these replace a DSR570... bad move... > Either way, we'l prolly see sony release a Z2 soon... maybe within 12 months with afew updates on recording formats (720p for eg) and better low light performance and rehashed firmware..
DVX100b ... pointless release... sure enough the camera itself and glass is almost perfect for this type of camera, but SD is on its way out.. maybe they should have put the reseources into the HVX in an atempt to lower its price... <I use 2 DVX100 units for the majority of my work. and cannot fault them one iota... no seriously.... for the event work i do, theyre perfect... >
JVC HD101.. i was advised by th JVC Sales rep to avoid it until its next update in 2006.. Im glad i took his advise.. Great potential marred by rushed mentality and technical glitches due ot the need to "beat canon" .
2006 should see some major improvements for this cam
Canon H1.. great potential if fitted with an EF adapter with some prime glass.. to begin with, but this cam shows great potential. Overkill for weddings and events, but well see it used simply for the wow factor of having one.. filmakers will love it, save for the HDV dropouts..
Frame mode in HD.. well with resolutions like this, i dont see that being a problem.. very pricey... will most likely drop in price (usually 25% in the first 12 months as history has shown in the past with canon pricing)
HVX200... great potentail marred by uneducated public. P2 prices are ridiculous but the ability to use an ipod to store your files is a miracle... lets hope someone comes out with an ipod like device with built in DVCProHD codecs so we can actually use the ipods as a recording drive, as oppsed to a storage drive.. in a live event, even ipods wont be good enough.. u need realtime recording to a HDD... IF smeone can hack an ipods firmware to allow one to install a DVCProHD codec and file structure, then weve got it made.. i dont see why it cant be done.. apart from licensing issues.. but if thats the case, maybe Pana should hook up with Apple or Creative or anyone else who makes this kind of device and offer a joint venture scheme.. im sure it would not only sell multiple units of these "pod" like devices, but will also allow the HVX to be a feasable camera to use for longform shooting, like weddings and concerts, and hence, sell more HVX units too.
At the moment, P2 just doesnt cut it for longform... when u consider price and media etc etc its jsut not worth it.. one may as well go and buy a FX1 for 4grand (AUD) and shoot in HDV and save themsleves 10 grand (AUD)..

P2s are just too costly and even the P2 Store is time consuming.. imagin if u only had one P2 card.. good luck shooting a wedding or stage performance..
If the glass and configurations are anything like the DVX, that would be a major factor in buying.. but support for MXF DVCProHD seems a little thin at this time (when it comes to Vegas) Tape mechanism is a good add on in case of emergencies.... woulda prefered to remove that though and have the ability to throw in a 2.5' HDD (it would fit if the tape innards are taken out)
I love my DVX cams and like i said, i cant fault them, and if the HVX is anything akin to the DVX, then i know it will be an awesome camera. The codec and multiple framerate alone is enough for me.. but the potential to make it more than that is there.. lets just hope pana take the opportunity to do somethign about the potential... ...

happy new year guys
Padre wrote on 12/29/2005, 2:26 AM
oh speaking of HD movies..
the only way HD will really take of here is with those Blu Ray or HD DVD units which upscale SD footage to HD res... If these manufacturers can offer more to the buyer as oppsed to the buyer having to go out and buy new versions of their movies, then theyll be set...
These upscaling DVD players are already available. I have a noname Chinese brand here which upscales to 1080i (but i prefer 720p)just go to ebay.com.au and search #5846588174 Mines different as it also does DivX HD, but this will give u an ide of what im talking about.. IF the new HD formats (blueray HD DVD) can also offer this function, then theyll be set...
farss wrote on 12/29/2005, 3:26 AM
Now here's the truly silly bit. Sony make a DVD player with a built in upscaler AND HDMI ouput, just bought one.
Now if a non nerd was to read all the lovely spiel on the box he might have some diificulty grasping just why he should buy a BD or HD DVD player and a replacement DVD library.
Ah but wait, there's more.
He didn't BUY that DVD library, they're all CDs full of DivX movies he's stolen though the net and this nice Sony box plays em, no sweat, guess if you can't root kit 'em you might as well make a buck out of 'em, somehow.
So maybe we've all been looking at this thing the wrong way around. BD or HD DVD might be a huge success after all, so long as the players will play DivX, then we can fit, oh, say 20 pirated movies onto the one disk and you don't even have to split those long PJ epics over two disks, my goodness, all three LORs on the one disk!

Bob.