OT: Which version of FLASH to make video

Chanimal wrote on 3/19/2005, 9:51 AM
I have Macromedia Flash MX (version 6.0)). I have never used it and will if this version will allow me to save video as flash files.

Will it work (no info on the Macromedia site)? What is the advantage of the most recent version?

Are there any other ways to convert video (avi, mpeg, quicktime, etc.) to flash?

***************
Ted Finch
Chanimal.com

Windows 11 Pro, i9 (10850k - 20 logical cores), Corsair water-cooled, MSI Gaming Plus motherboard, 64 GB Corsair RAM, 4 Samsung Pro SSD drives (1 GB, 2 GB, 2 GB and 4 GB), AMD video Radeo RX 580, 4 Dell HD monitors.Canon 80d DSL camera with Rhode mic, Zoom H4 mic. Vegas Pro 21 Edit (user since Vegas 2.0), Camtasia (latest), JumpBacks, etc.

Comments

jlafferty wrote on 3/19/2005, 11:41 AM
For your last question, you can render out Flash in SwishVideo is you're not looking to spend too much (it goes for $50), and for a little more and marginally better quality, Sorenson has their Flash encoder at about $120.

There are other products, but these are the two I've had the best experience with. Swish offers a free, fully functioning 30-day trial -- Sorenson offers a trial that burns a Sorenson logo over your encodes -- but does give you a good idea of files sizes and quality you'll be getting with the final product.

- jim
MUTTLEY wrote on 3/19/2005, 11:56 AM
I recently bought the Flash Video Kit and converted the majority of the video on my site to .flv files ( the new Flash video format, different from Flashes standard .swf files.) After seeing some amazing examples out there of video in flash I decided to make the switch hoping for bigger videos with faster load times that were also cross platform. In the past I was having to render out 4 versions of each video I posted, a high quality and low quality version of both wmv and QuickTime.

So far the reviews are mixed. Many who have been to my site say that even the large videos load almost instantly and look amazing. Others have reported having some choke and a couple have said that the videos fall out of synch.

So in the end it wasn't quite the magic bullet I had hoped it would be. Overall I do like it a bit better than wmv or QuickTime. The quality and size, at least when I watch em, are still pretty impressive. I also like the pop-up semitransparent control bar on the video itself ( though one mac user told me that this feature did not work for them. )

You can check out the vids on my site to see what you think, they're under the " Media " section.

- Ray

www.undergroundplanet.com

P.S. Forgot to mention that I do use Dreamweaver but use Sorenson Squeeze 4.0 to convert my files to flv. as opposed to the Flash program. If my understanding is correct, there is a lighter version of Sorenson Squeeze that comes with Flash but it is not as robust as the standalone.
BillyBoy wrote on 3/19/2005, 1:13 PM
All the mini vids on my tutorial site were made in Vegas, then rendered as highly compressed WMV files then imported into Flash where they were again compressed at tad more with the built-in video software. The result is decent (suitable for web site) quality with comparatively small file size.

Click below and goto Pan/Crop, click on 2nd thumbnail (boy) then play the two little vids for example of quality. Since they are converted to Flash they load very fast on a broadband connection and in a reasonable time with dial -up. I think a nice feature is to show file download progress so would be viewers can bail out if they think downloading is taking too long.

www.bb-video.net
Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/19/2005, 2:15 PM

Ted, I would second what Muttley said. I would highly recommend you go the Sorenson route--great software and the compressed files deliver stunning video!

I've made some Flash files with it and it looks as good as the Windows Media stuff I've done. You won't be disappointed.


FuTz wrote on 3/19/2005, 2:21 PM

... and the files weight vs. quality: amazing !
Erk wrote on 3/19/2005, 3:30 PM
Jay or Muttley,

I'm looking at the "Sorenson Squeeze 4 for Macromedia Flash MX" but its not clear to me, does it require Flash MX? I have Flash 4. The requirements don't mention Flash at all, but perhaps that's implicit.

Thanks, Greg
Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/19/2005, 3:48 PM

Greg, no it doesn't require Flash MX.

[EDIT]
I forgot to mention, if you do compression work for clients, you may want to seriously consider Sorenson Squeeze 4 Compression Suite.


MUTTLEY wrote on 3/19/2005, 3:50 PM

The Sorenson Squeeze packages are standalone application, so no, you don't even have to have Flash to use em.

- Ray

www.undergroundplanet.com