Pan/Crop :the Smoothness setting is important

Jøran Toresen wrote on 12/22/2005, 8:00 PM

Jan Ozer reviewed several NLE’s in the article: “Battle of the Software NLEs, Part 4: Slideshows, Rendering, and Conclusions”. See

http://www.eventdv.net/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?CategoryID=62&ArticleID=10771

He points to a problem that has occurred several times to me: “Vegas provides multiple interpolative paths between keyframes, but even when we selected a linear path, it kept implementing a smooth path, which at times actually moved a portion of the image out of the frame. While this could have been a computer-specific anomaly, it's worth watching out for when producing your slideshows.”

I had this problem too, until I reread the manual. In the chapter “Adding Video Transitions and Motion, you can read this:

* Temporal interpolation (how the pan occurs over time) is controlled by the keyframe interpolation curve type. Experiment with temporal interpolation by right-clicking a keyframe to change the interpolation type (hold, linear, fast, slow, smooth) and previewing the result.

* Spatial interpolation (how the pan occurs within the video image) is controlled by the Smoothness setting of each keyframe. If you have three or more keyframes, the blue arc in the window shows the path of the center of the frame during the panning. A smoothness value of 0 makes the movement linear from one keyframe to the next. A higher smoothness value makes the path of the pan more curved. Select at keyframe and change the Smoothness value to adjust spatial interpolation.”

Then my problem was solved: I set the Smoothness parameter to 0, and a portion of the image never moves out of the frame! But I wish Sony could set the Smoothness parameter to 0, instead of 1, as the default.

Best wishes,
Joran

Comments

Spot|DSE wrote on 12/22/2005, 8:11 PM
Agreed, but this is also why John Rofrano gave us the script that settles it all to 0. I wish Vegas gave us access to the default.
Get the script here.
jeff-beardall wrote on 12/22/2005, 8:50 PM
Maybe I'm totally out to lunch but when I do pan and scans I just make sure the x & y centres under 'rotation' are the same for each keyframe and the picture never goes out of frame...try it out...maybe it only works for me in my universe, but you never know
Jessariah67 wrote on 12/22/2005, 8:58 PM
I have to second the "smoothness" problem. I spent a lot of time a few years back trying to figure out why "liner" wasn't linear. Since then, clicking the 1.000 and making it a ZERO is as automatic as breathing - and a tedious pain. Have NEVER used 1.000 or 100 smoothing and think it's about time that "zero" was made as the default - or at least an option in preferences.

Didn't know about John's script. Thanks, Douglas. That'll save a lot of time...
Yoyodyne wrote on 12/22/2005, 10:53 PM
Good to know - this has driven me kind of nuts a couple of times. I'm all for the 0 as default setting -
Coursedesign wrote on 12/22/2005, 11:15 PM
I think the Vegas team could save a lot of support calls, and perhaps more importantly, save a lot of customers who today think Vegas quality sucks because of this really unsuitable default, and of course the unusable Vegas DVD rendering default that makes people think the software quality sucks...

It's hard to anything that would be simpler to implement while having a large impact.

Perhaps in Vegas 9.
Grazie wrote on 12/22/2005, 11:40 PM

Coursie you make some excellent points. These items seem so essential to NLE/DVD work that I'm starting to ask myself several fundamental, central and crucial questions - where, how and at what point does the NLE video editor's "experience" feedback to the developers? This is very different to working out what bugs there are and why some functions don't work.

Visuals, and the ease with which we, as editors, get to the narrative of a video, is crucial to success.

I want Vegas to keep on succeeding - oh yes!

Grazie
Jøran Toresen wrote on 12/24/2005, 5:19 AM
Thank you for the script!

Joran