Comments

goshep wrote on 8/12/2005, 4:49 PM
I considered it for my latest upgrade but couldn't find anyone with any real world experience to confirm performance. I too would be interested in knowing (albeit too late.)

BUMP
VVentures wrote on 8/12/2005, 8:42 PM
I have the new Gateway 840GM which has the Pentium D 3.0GHz processor. I also have a Gateway700GR with 3.4GHz HT. I noticed a pretty significant difference between the 2. Both have 2GB or RAM but a typical render on the HT computer for a wedding might be 4 hours whereas on the Pentium D it was about 2.5 hours.
filmy wrote on 8/12/2005, 9:32 PM
>>>I also have a Gateway700GR with 3.4GHz HT<<<

Hey..totally OT to this thread but did you have the overheating/power draw = auto shutdown issues when you got this? I got this unit when it first came out...and I do mean "first". Tech support had not even played with these and offered no real help at all. By the suggestions of the folk in these here parts (meaning these Vegas video forums) I did testing and found out the included power supply is under par for what the system was being hyped as/for. (Video editing) Gateway has never offered any sort of "Sorry" or offered to upgrade the power supply. No sir - after many tech calls and emails, and when I finally discovered it was the power supply and informed them, I got a snail mail letter from them saying something along the lines of: "We are happy you found, and resolved, the problem on your own. If there is anything else we can do please let us know. Thank you for choosing Gateway"
Wolfgang S. wrote on 8/13/2005, 3:20 AM
I think the thread is not offtopic- for m2t it is a central thread. Since Vegas does not support special hardware cards as Canopus does, most of us will look for faster PCs for m2t cutting.

So, I am keen to learn more about the experience with a Gateway 700GR and Pentium D. Have you tested m2t footage, how many frames do you see if you play m2t footage from the timeline directly (in what preview quality)? Would be a great information.

Desktop: PC AMD 3960X, 24x3,8 Mhz * RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)* Blackmagic Extreme 4K 12G * QNAP Max8 10 Gb Lan * Resolve Studio 18 * Edius X* Blackmagic Pocket 6K/6K Pro, EVA1, FS7

Laptop: ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED * internal HDR preview * i9 12900H with i-GPU Iris XE * 32 GB Ram) * Geforce RTX 3070 TI 8GB * internal HDR preview on the laptop monitor * Blackmagic Ultrastudio 4K mini

HDR monitor: ProArt Monitor PA32 UCG-K 1600 nits, Atomos Sumo

Others: Edius NX (Canopus NX)-card in an old XP-System. Edius 4.6 and other systems

Xander wrote on 8/13/2005, 1:32 PM
I have the Dell XPS Gen 5 with Pentium 840 D. It is definitely significantly faster than my previous P4 3.2 GHz HT. Rendering to .m2t from Cinform HD avi's with no video fx, etc. is almost real-time. I normally do network rendering locally on the PC to maximise CPU usage.