Plugins for Vegas 4

DataMeister wrote on 1/19/2003, 9:38 PM
Hi,

I have a running list of companies, whom I write to, that create interesting plugins for the video market and I recently wrote RE:Vision Effects asking if they had considered porting over their software to Vegas. Thought you guys and SoFo might be interested in seeing the reply. Maybe this is why there are very few big name plugins.

Here is RE:Vision's reply.

------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------

JBJones

Comments

Ritchie wrote on 1/20/2003, 8:23 AM
Hmm, being able to use any Premiere or AE compatible plug-ins would be nice. Are there licensing issues with adding such support?
DataMeister wrote on 1/20/2003, 9:44 AM
Hmmm. I don't know if there are licensing issues or not. It seems like everyone and their brother in the photo editing world has Photoshop plugin support. Also, it seems like the more software that supports the plugin specs, the more likely people will see it as a standard and write for it, which would be in Adobe's best interest. Useing those arguments I would say that it would be free or very cheap to license.

But, then (with Photoshop plugins) it's not actually everyone that supports those plugins. Usually the only the software with advanced capabilities. So that would be fairly good argument that it might be licensed.

And in reality, I would imagine a trip over to Adobe's web site might have helped prevent all of this speculation. But, oh well. It's written now. Might as well post it.

JBJones
satish wrote on 1/20/2003, 10:35 AM
Currently i'm working on adding AfterFX plugin support to Vegas.

- Satish
Ritchie wrote on 1/20/2003, 11:51 AM
Yeah :-)
DataMeister wrote on 1/20/2003, 11:52 AM
Are you working on this for Sonic Foundry or just for your own enjoyment? I'm just curious. It seems like After Effects support should be something high on Sonic Foundry's list of things to do. So their best programers should be on the job or at least someone in house with access to the Vegas source code. Unless of course, you are one of their best programmers. :)

JBJones
Paradox wrote on 1/20/2003, 12:13 PM
My guess is that a lot of what we like about Vegas and causes it to excel over the others would be compromised by adapting to other models. BTW, have you all checked out the coming verson 2 of Pixelan spicemaster. Looks like a killer.
Paul_Holmes wrote on 1/20/2003, 12:50 PM
Satish is one of their best programmmers. He just doesn't work for them!
DataMeister wrote on 1/20/2003, 1:42 PM
satish wrote on 1/20/2003, 2:38 PM
I am not trying out this for SoFo, just on my own.
Paradox wrote on 1/20/2003, 2:43 PM
Actually, looks like early February for the Vegas version
mlaney wrote on 1/20/2003, 3:46 PM
Satish,

Do you know if anyone is working on OMF export for those of us who occasionally send projects over to a Pro Tools session? As you know Automatic Duck created a OMF plug-in for Final Cut Pro.

Thanks for your thoughts
Marion
satish wrote on 1/20/2003, 4:13 PM
No i am not in touch with anyone working on OMF export for Vegas. I'm having a look at the OMF documents now and let me see if it is possible for me to do something ...

Thanks
aboukirev wrote on 1/20/2003, 4:27 PM
There is a project on Sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/aaf/
They have an OMF-to-AAF conversion utility, with source. Perhaps backwards too.
I'm not in need of this, neither am interested in more details. Just happened to stumble on it.
I'll be looking into 'bins' import/export - one of the features I wanted in VV. It can be done with scripting, and that's fine with me.

Alexei
DataMeister wrote on 1/20/2003, 6:25 PM
I'm curious. I don't know much about using ProTools, but what would OMF export provide once you got on the ProTools system? How would it be used in a project?

JBJones
mlaney wrote on 1/21/2003, 9:58 AM
To the question of why Pro-Tools:
My company does programming for the Food Network and PBS. Due to the nature of our shows small cameras (ie: DVCAM) have been our trademark.

We used to have to bump all the DV footage to Beta SP or 3/4 to edit on Avid MediaComposers. Now we use DV Express 3.5 and export an OMF to our sound designer who uses Pro-Tools and then outputs a OMF file which we layback to the video in a Avid Symphony session where we output a master on NETWORK required 4 ch Digi-Beta.

I LOVE VV4 and would love to move our editing to this platform but I stll have to output an OMF to our sound designer. One reason is he then has handles (extra in and out audio at each sound edit) which allow him to shift the edit and/or fade in any direction to meet his specs.

I then have to bring it back into the Symphony to finish in Digi-Beta.

If I just give him an AIF file he is limited in his "artistry".

Hope this illuminates why I need OMF export. Thanks>>> Marion
DataMeister wrote on 1/21/2003, 12:44 PM
That helps with my question about the OMF a little. But also, I'm wondering what the OMF tells the sound designer.

Is it just saying that there is a cut here, here, and here, in the video stream? It seems to me that when designing a sound track, most work would be done while watching the video feed. Is the OMF file basicly just a text file with time information or does it include the audio tracks?

I haven't had to work on projects where the audio and video were edited on differenty systems. So, I'm just wondering how much information is usually communicated by this OMF file.

Thanks,
JBJones
mlaney wrote on 1/22/2003, 4:33 PM
JB,
Usually the editor burns a CD with the OMF file which tags and moves the audio media onto the CD with the "handles" I spoke of which allow the sound dsigner some extra leeway in the mix.

An Avid user group or Pro-Tools group could give you more indepth information.

http://www.dmnforums.com/cgi-bin/disp.fcgi?dire=4&prog=displaywwugindex.fcgi&endday=7&forum=avid_xpress

best,
Marion
bjtap wrote on 1/22/2003, 7:41 PM
SpiceMaster2 is coming sometime in February as BigT says... this is common knowledge now. I was one of the beta testers and I admit I really was very impressed. Probably the thing that impressed me the most was the simplicity to get a PIP that is not limited to a static rectangle. Check out the demo when it is available. That's my humble opinion.
Barry