Rendered File Sizes Limited to 3.99GB

vegasnewbie wrote on 2/1/2004, 12:37 AM
After rendering a 43-minute long video in Vegas 4, I found that it produced the following avi files:

File A: 3.99GB File B: 3.99GB File C: 1.11GB

This was an unexpected result, I thought Vegas would produce ONE rendered .avi file with a size of about 9GB.

When producing the final video in DVD Architect, I somehow need to combine Files A, B, and C, so that I get a continuous video of 43 minutes.

Can anyone tell me why Vegas 4 produced a maximum rendered .avi file of only 3.99GB? Is there any way of correcting this problem so that only one .avi file is produced after rendering, in this example it would be 9GB long.

In addition, can Files A, B and C be combined for the purpose of producing the DVD with DVD Architect? I am using the PAL system.

Thanks very much for your help.

Regards, Fred

Comments

PeterWright wrote on 2/1/2004, 1:35 AM
Sounds like your drive is formatted FAT32 - What OS do you have? You need NTFS formatting to have unlimited size avis.

However, if you put the three avis together on a timeline in Vegas, you can render them to a single MPEG2 file.
vegasnewbie wrote on 2/1/2004, 8:59 AM
"Sounds like your drive is formatted FAT32 - What OS do you have? You need NTFS formatting to have unlimited size avis. However, if you put the three avis together on a timeline in Vegas, you can render them to a single MPEG2 file. "

Thanks very much Peter for this reply, I am using Win98SE at the moment, do you know if this allows for NTFS formatting, or do you need to have Windows XP? I have rendered as .avi, but if I were to render to a single MPEG2 file, would the video quality be as good as rendering to avi? I am not outputting to tape, but I intend to burn a DVD using DVD Architect.

Regards, Fred
craftech wrote on 2/1/2004, 9:10 AM
You can render multiple 4 GB files to AVI using W98SE, but you are limited to 3.99 for Mpeg. I found out this undocumented "feature" the hard way myself.
Posting here got me the answer. If your menus will be a few pages of motion icons in DVDA adjust the birate settings (using a bitrate calculator) in Vegas to have the Mpeg 2 come out to as close to 3.99GB as possible. Use the NTSC DVDA video template for the video. Then render the audio as AC3 and put it in the same folder as the Mpeg 2. DVDA will find them and put them together. That combined with the menus will bring it close to the limit for a recordable DVDR. My limit seems to be 1hr and 40 minutes of video on a single DVDR before quality takes a hit. Variable Bitrate is somewhere around 5000.

You can read through my thread from back then for some further help:

http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.com/Forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=227596

John
Liam_Vegas wrote on 2/1/2004, 9:13 AM
If you are only going to be burning this to DVD (and not to AVI) then you may as well go straight to MPEG2 from the timeline rather than rendering it to an intermediate AVI file first.

Now if you want to go back and edit this video later on then you will have to have the original AVI's that you used to create the MPEG2 as re-editing from an MPEG2 will require a re-encode and compression resulting in a more likely noticable loss in quality.
randy-stewart wrote on 2/1/2004, 9:16 AM
Fred,
Windows ME and older will not do NTSC, they use the FAT32 format for storing files on disk. That's limited to 3.99GB as stated earlier. Vegas works around that seamlessly. However, for DVD, use the MPEG-2 format. Re-render using the MPEG-2 NTSC DVD template. Make sure the quality level is set to best (custom button, quality level). The file size should be less than 4.0GB. Then you can run DVDA and burn your DVD. The quality is superb, better than you would get if you copied your .avi file to VHS tape via your camcorder (unless you have a professional level VHS recorder). I'm encoraging all of my relatives to get DVD players as the video I send them are so much better viewed that way. Hope this helps.
Randy
vegasnewbie wrote on 2/1/2004, 10:09 AM
Thanks very much for these replies. When I ask DVD Architect to burn a disc from an avi file, it says that the video and audio will be compressed. This is the case every time, even if the avi file size is only 1GB. I am not sure why this is because a DVD will hold 4.7GB of data.

Perhaps it is because a DVD is in MPEG2 format, so I would then agree with Randy that if my final output is to DVD, I might as well render in the MPEG2 format to start with, there doesn't seem much point in rendering to avi if you are burning a DVD?

When I rendered a 43-minute video to .avi, the overall file size was about 9GB, so this would have to be substantially compressed to fit on a 4.7GB DVD disc. So what would be the main use of a 9GB avi file, even if my computer could produce it?

Regards, Fred
Liam_Vegas wrote on 2/1/2004, 10:24 AM
DVD's can ONLY have MPEG formated video on them. So when you give DVDA <any> AVI file <regardless> of size it will always report that it will need "compressing". It has less to do with the file size and everything to do with the format it needs to be in to go onto a DVD.

The point about (DV) AVI files is that they are easier (more efficient) to edit and are actually higher quality than MPEG2. My prior post gives some further reasons why in your case there is probably little need for you to render an intermediate AVI from your editing projects and then render again to MPEG using DVDA. Rather for your type of workflow and needs just go straight to MPEG2 from Vegas.
PeterWright wrote on 2/1/2004, 4:37 PM
Fred,

If the avi is 9 Gb the MPEG 2 will be easily small enough to get on a DVD. ( At a squash - lower bitrate - up to 2 hours has been squeezed on a DVD).

Why make a 9Gb avi? Many good reasons - so it can be output to DV tape - so that all source camera footage can then be deleted saving space - so that it can be used for rendering into various other formats - e.g. MPEG1 or WMV.

But, if you are heading for DVD alone, then straight to MPEG2 sounds the way to go, as Liam says.
vegasnewbie wrote on 2/1/2004, 8:44 PM
Thanks very much Peter for these comments. I have just rendered the 43-minute project to MPEG2 in Vegas 4, and this took about 4 hours (a lot longer than rendering to an avi file). I then imported the project into DVD Architect and burned a DVD with about 40 chapters, including sub menus. This took a further 35 minutes of rendering time. The default bitrate was 8.000 Mbps and the file size that was generated by DVD for this 43-minute DVD was 1.89 GB. So this is certainly a substantial reduction on the avi file size for the same project of 9GB and solved my immediate problem, because I can now get one continuous video burned to DVD.

On this basis, I guess I could get about 90 minutes of MPEG 2 video (at the best quality video setting) onto a 4.7 GB DVD. Would this be about right?

If I had altered the bitrate to the maximum of 9.800 Mbps, would this have improved the quality of the video and increased the file size by much? I would have to say that the video quality on the DVD was very good, I couldn’t really see much difference on my TV between the quality of the video burned to DVD and the quality of the video I get from playing the DV tape back direct from the camera. But if I had a high definition TV, perhaps I would notice a difference.

With regard to outputting a 9GB avi file to DV tape, yes I can see this would be an advantage for subsequent editing, if required. People are advised not to buy a DVD camcorder if they are keen on doing computer video editing with a program such as Vegas 4.

Incidentally, the audio setting for DVD Architect was “automatic”, but do you think it would be better to set this to AC-3 stereo?

Thanks for your help.

Regards, Fred
PeterWright wrote on 2/1/2004, 9:38 PM
Glad you got it done, Fred.

Rendering to MPEG2 will always take a fair bit longer than DV avi, as there's lots of compressing going on. How long depends on many things, including how much compositing and effects you've done, and whether the foregrounds and backgrounds are static or constantly moving, such as wavy trees.

90 min on a DVD is a fair average - if you slide the bitrate up higher, it may look marginally better but it may affect its playabilty on some DVD players. I think the max of 9.8 includes audio, so video at 8.0 is fine - anywhere down to 6 still can look great.

If you haven't already done so "manually", DVDA will automatically convert the audio to AC3 - that's what would have taken the extra rendering time, plus rendering menus, particularly motion menus, or background menu music.

As you say, these cameras which record on DVD are best kept for when nothing further is to be done with the footage.