I assume you mean camcorder?
Panasonic make a small consumer one or there's the EZ35, both take good images but I've single CCD cameras that do better.
I'm starting to feel a lot of this 3CCD thing is to some extent just marketing hype. For sure in pro cameras thet're 3CCD but there BIG CCDs with low pixel counts. I don't know how well that translates into any advantage having 3 1/6" CCDs compared to 1 1/3" CCD. I do now that 3 CCDs means at least one more thing that can screw up the image, the quality of the prism and then there's keeping the CCDs aligned.
If you want a really nice small camera I don't think you can go wrong with the PC110, single CCD but good glass and good build quality.
Panasonic has an inexpensive (around $1000 street price) three-chipper MiniDV (PV-DV953) that uses 3 1/4" chips. I played with one at Circuit City a few weeks ago and it seemed to produce rather nice images. They also have two other three-chip models, the PV-GS120 and the PV-GS200 at $700 and $1,000 respectively (retail.) These two models use 1/6" chips, which don't perform quite as well in low light, but all the low end camcorders, whether 3-chip or single chip, are going to 1/6" chips.
Here are some rather comprehensive, in-depth reviews of these three camcorders:
I had a chance to borrow a friend's Panasonic PV-GS200 camcorder a few weeks back. One overcast day I shot a few seconds' worth of interior and exterior scenes with my trusty old Sony TRV8 (single-chip), my newish Sony VX2000 (3 chip), and the panasonic (3 chip).
The color ability of the Panasonic was much closer to the VX2000 than the TRV8; greens in particular were more realistic and vivid. As I recall, it seemed to have edge sharpening more like the TRV8; by contrast, the VX2000 image doesn't appear to have much sharpening, a look which I prefer. The zoom control was very sensitive and I did not like it at all, though the action could be tamed with practice and/or with the use of an external zoom controller.
The camera was about the size of my little TRV8, though a bit fatter.
I've some experience with the Pana's. I have a 952 3-Chip and I have to say that, in terms of color rendition, I don't think anything else comes close at the price. Comparing it with a pana 910, the color is significantly better and if you take the time to do a manual white balance, is really very good indeed. I have a friend with a GS200 that does almost as well. That said, there are a couple of things you need to be aware of.
First, the 952 is horrible in low loght, the GS200 is a little better but with 1/6" sensors, neither are really good if you don't have the lumens. The LCD panel on the 952 is much better than the one on the GS200, having a much wider field of view and generally a bighter, sharper image. The manual overrides are much easier to get at on the bigger 952 too (that may be important to you). The newer 953 has manual audio which would definitely be of benefit to me but still no XLR. The GS200 can be had for under a grand.