SoFo Workbench Option? Please?

Grazie wrote on 4/2/2003, 11:53 PM
I've noticed I'm doing a lot of "Trail 'n Error" testing.

I use the Tutorials and of course this most wonderful Forum and other forums. However I'm forever going all over the place to "tie" together stuff. It would also give a very efficient way for SoFo tech support to have input AND maybe for us to be able find solutions for Vegas/VF users here, prior top people needing to phone/email/fax SoFo Support. This takes up time for SoFo reps. And what does Time equate to? Money! - Hey guys you have the technology - Let's turn this into something beneficial for all concerned!

Soooo . . . . Please please SoFo - SonicDennis et al - could you make available a "TestBench" or "WorkBench" SoFo website where we could place/upload "short" [5-10 second] clips and graphics files for all to see and comment on? - Now THAT would be a real advance on the competition!

I think it's a neat idea - might have been "floated" before, but what do others think?

Best regards,

Grazie

Comments

Spot|DSE wrote on 4/3/2003, 1:02 AM
So who pays for the bandwidth? Which is why I'm not willing to do it on our site. Doing such a thing has put MANY a business under. That's why you have personal websites, at your own expense. You put it up, let us know it's there, we'll link to it from the Sundance Media site. SOFO has enough to deal with at the moment. I assure you, no one at SOFO is EVER sitting on their butt with enough time to manage a project of the proportions that this would turn into.
Chienworks wrote on 4/3/2003, 5:50 AM
Let's see ... currently vegasusers.com has about 230 video clips uploaded at an average of 7.5MB each. There are an average of about 175 views per day. This is 1.7GB of storage and 1.3GB/day of data transfer. Storage isn't a problem, but my connection can only handle about 4GB/day maximum, so i've got some bandwidth left, but 30% is considered a pretty heavy load. Back when i was working for a commercial ISP we'd freak if the load hit 5% on our T-1 line. The only reason the files and transfer are this low is because most of the files are compressed to 256Kbps. DV files at 7.5MB would be only 2 seconds long. A 10 second DV clip would be 37.5MB. Adding even a few of these to vegasusers.com would trash the connection. It's just not practical. Maybe a few years from now when everyone has 100Mbps fibre running into their homes it would work, but by then i'm sure DV will be considered the poor man's compression and HD files at several GB/minute will be the norm.
Grazie wrote on 4/3/2003, 10:10 AM
Chienworks, thank you for your polite and informative reply.

Grazie
Udi wrote on 4/3/2003, 11:17 AM
There is another way.
Sofo can create a bunch of "demo" clips and stills that we all share (on CD and/or downloadable).
Then we can transfer .veg files without the whole data.
For most questions and trials it might work.
Chienworks wrote on 4/3/2003, 12:41 PM
I've been thinking about this some more. For many tests and questions, a 3Mbps WMV file would probably suffice. At 10 seconds these files are less than 4MB. Perhaps we could come up with a list of particular sample clips that would be useful, such as: close up face on plain background, person running, backlit portrait, wedding group interior lighting, subject on still complex background, subject on moving background, ... etc. and have people submit 5 to 10 second samples that fit these descriptions. I'd be able to make these available at vegasusers.com in a catalog. One could then submit a .veg file for others to experiment with and say that this .veg file requires clips 002, 015, 047, and 103 from the catalog. Others could download these clips as needed, hopefully storing them locally to avoid repeating downloads. If the project calls for it the clips could be rerendered to DV, but in most cases leaving it as WMV should suffice.

Projects that require a specific clip supplied by the project's creator could be uploaded as 3Mbps WMV for a limited time period, say one month or so. If it seems like a good candidate for the catalog and enough people vote for it during the month, it could be made a permanent entry. Otherwise it would be deleted. Likewise, any clips that aren't used for a very long period of time could be purged to make room for new ones.

Would this be helpful?
Grazie wrote on 4/3/2003, 1:02 PM
Yup! That'll do me. Good idea Kelly. I could then download - play with it. Add some stuff - make mistakes re-post; veg too; ideas and comments on the results. THIS would be a real Test-Bench. Purge and then get on with the next thing.

Maybe a catalogue of :

Idea: Format: Concept: Issue: Resolution:

I dunno - waddya fink?

Kelly, this needs a bit more thinking and scoping through. Let's keep this going - maybe a post over at the COW will "lassoo" some stray heffers! Yup?

I think we're definately onto something - yeah?

Grazie
Spot|DSE wrote on 4/4/2003, 8:59 AM
Again, guys, both are BRILLIANT concepts, and beneficial for most everyone. It's that it's people outside of SOFO wanting to allocate SOFO's resources. We've had media like this available at our Sundance site for nearly a year. It's an issue though to constantly manage the uploads as it is. SOFO, I'm sure, doesn't have a person to manage yet another aspect of their site. Maybe code could be written to not accept files of over 1 meg, and to delete all files after 30 days. This is why we no longer accept streams ON our site, but will link to as many sites as we can. Chienworks has a terrific site for viewing this media as well.
Chienworks wrote on 4/5/2003, 12:05 PM
Well, i'd be putting this on my own server, so it won't be eating up SonicFoundry's resources at all. The scripts i've written can already be set to reject oversized uploads. Since storage isn't a problem at all, i'd probably go for at least 90 days though, possibly much longer. Lots of people like to tinker and mull over ideas for long periods of time. This definately sounds doable.
Grazie wrote on 4/5/2003, 1:38 PM
Kelly! Brillllliiant! If it would be up and running Sunday 6th April our London Trio might make use of it.

Thank you very much . . . Will it have a veg deposit option so we could put up "problem" veggies? WIll it handle graphics so we can share what we are trying to tell each other?

My very bestest regards,

Grazie
BillyBoy wrote on 4/5/2003, 1:54 PM
Sounds like a good idea. Another suggestion... A simple site search engine would be very useful. I've used them on my other sites frequently in the past. Fairly simple Perl scripting you can write yourself (if you're into programming) or many canned versions on the web for chump change ($50 on less) very similar to what SoFo has.
I can't use mine now, WideOpenWest doesn't allow any CGI at this time. :-(
Chienworks wrote on 4/5/2003, 4:04 PM
Grazie, April 6th? doubtful, sorry. This weekend's project list is already a mile long. Next weekend is much more reasonable. But yes, it will allow uploads of veggies, stills, even sound clips and such too. Probably the maximum file size will be 5MB, maybe less for the non-video files.

Billyboy, search is no problem. I've already got the scripts written for some of my other sites, most notably TOASTEDspam.com which has many thousands of entries. I've been meaning to add search to the video sharing site for a while now. I'll try to get the whole site revamped over the next week to include all this stuff.
Grazie wrote on 4/5/2003, 10:30 PM
Kelly, no worries mate! - Whatever we do we will review it and see what we can upload - it will be up to the others today to decide. As it happens it is the Oxford-Cambridge University Boat Race in London today - MIGHT have some footage MAYBE not - we'll see!

I love the idea of the MIXED media upload options. Neat.

Best regards

Grazie