Barry Green goes on all the forums, plus other Panasonc promoters do too, and claim that the Sony CF24 mode is unusable. The main reason according to them is uneven motion, which is best seen when the footage is played frame by frame. The second problem they have is that the shutter speed is too high, at 1/60 sec. Their third thing is that Varicam is progressive and Sony is not.
It seems to me that the truth is that the Varicam has a similar uneven motion when played frame by frame. It is because both cameras have their clocks set at 60 Hz and from this 24 Hz is extracted, in normal 60p recording mode. You get the similar uneven motion effect when 24 fps film gets converted into 60i. It looks fine at normal viewing speed.
In the 60p recording mode Varicam too uses 1/60 min. shutter speed for future converted 24p work.
The CF mode extracts from the interlaced CCD's 1080p with image quality similar to Panasonic's 720p. It definitely is progressive.
It seems to me that the truth is that the Varicam has a similar uneven motion when played frame by frame. It is because both cameras have their clocks set at 60 Hz and from this 24 Hz is extracted, in normal 60p recording mode. You get the similar uneven motion effect when 24 fps film gets converted into 60i. It looks fine at normal viewing speed.
In the 60p recording mode Varicam too uses 1/60 min. shutter speed for future converted 24p work.
The CF mode extracts from the interlaced CCD's 1080p with image quality similar to Panasonic's 720p. It definitely is progressive.