studio to computer rgb....

ushere wrote on 3/21/2009, 5:19 PM
i know, it's been discussed (according to my search), but i'm still unclear as to when to convert....

i'm preparing a arts program that's going out on dvd, but is most likely to be played on pc's and on lcd screens from dvd players.

a lot of my shots look better on my lcd for conversion (st > pc rgb), but not so hot on my crt monitor.

the programs shot in hd, and will be released in sd - though if there's space on the disk, i'll put either a hd mp4 or wmv as well. (any thoughts as to which is the better?)

oi vey, where's my fora tbc?

Comments

farss wrote on 3/21/2009, 7:33 PM
Sorta diffiucult call. I do it the old school way, keep everything legal and let the dice fall where they may.
I use a pretty basic Curve to bring my highlights into legal, maybe, just maybe ever so slightly crush the blacks at legal black.
For WMV and web delivery that wants ComputerRGB I add another FX to convert from my legal video to ComputerRGB, then it's simple to en/dis-able the conversion as I render to different formats.

Of course one problem you face is LCDs in general are none to hot in the blacks at the best of times and if they've been adjusted for general desktop duties or just left as they came out of the box they can be all over the place. Always better to try and get the display adjusted rather than chasing badly adjusted displays and heck, does the public even notice anyway.

Bob.
ushere wrote on 3/21/2009, 8:28 PM
thanks bob, knew i could depend on you - but i posted here in case anybody else has the same question / thought....

that said, i'm never going to have control over lcd's outside of my living room (well, maybe a couple of friends ;-)), and added to that, i have no idea if people getting a dvd with (a clearly labelled) hd file on it are going to watch the dvd on their pc or tv.

this sorta rules out having two versions, ie, sudio dvd, pc rgb.

i'm tempted to do the whole edit as normal (studio), then check finished in both studio then computer on all available pc, lcd, crt screens... then release the dvd version in whatever looks best... that said though, i have a feeling it's going to be seen on lcd's more than anything.

finally, for projection, i presume i should go with computer rgb?

thanks again,

leslie

TheHappyFriar wrote on 3/21/2009, 9:02 PM
yes. in fact, I think the studio setting is only really useful for CRT's. I've never had any issues using computer RPG video on LCD's (TV or monitor), projectors, and my CRT tv/monitor.

a badly adjusted anything will always yield bad results. IE if the preset on a projector is set for "presentation" then a video will look pretty yuk.
ushere wrote on 3/21/2009, 9:47 PM
i agree hf, never had any problem playing RPG on lcd's ;-)

so, in your experience, you burn dvd's that are computer rgb'd rather than studio?

thanks

leslie
TheHappyFriar wrote on 3/21/2009, 10:13 PM
i don't normally convert to studio at all. I let things alone. I do CGI (from games, 3d, 2d) on to DVD & DV/HDV. Always looks good. When everyone I knew had CRT TV's (I have an old NEC monitor next to me that I preview on, must not care about using computer RGB as there's no issues) I would put things legal, but everyone I know has LCD TV's or projectors so i stopped worrying.
musicvid10 wrote on 3/21/2009, 11:28 PM
I don't think there's a dvd player on the planet that will output an out-of-bounds signal to a tv or monitor, regardless of the levels in the file. Doing so would place a huge risk on player manufacturers, even though the sets have AGC to handle overloads.

That being said, if you don't want your video highlights bumping up against the player's limiting circuitry, it's probably a good idea to keep it close to "legal." I doubt computer rgb would create much of a practical problem.

"yes. in fact, I think the studio setting is only really useful for CRT's."

My impression has been that it's mainly for analog broadcasts (and they are almost gone). Unconstrained highlights would exceed the RF bandwidth, blowing out the whites on the screen, and splattering all over the audio carrier frequency, causing the most obnoxious buzzing sound. Like with some older Nintendo toys that used those really crappy RF modulators.
megabit wrote on 3/22/2009, 3:53 AM
My impression has been that it's mainly for analog broadcasts (and they are almost gone). Unconstrained highlights would exceed the RF bandwidth, blowing out the whites on the screen, and splattering all over the audio carrier frequency, causing the most obnoxious buzzing sound. Like with some older Nintendo toys that used those really crappy RF modulators.

Very true, but this is only a part of the potential problems - the other being lost detail in the clipped super-whites or -blacks.

That said, I never really saw a DVD/BD player / (HD)TV combination that would do it to my DVD/BD's even if I didn't care to apply the "broadcast safe" FX (or adjust levels manually). However, in commercial DVD's I'll always do it...

AMD TR 2990WX CPU | MSI X399 CARBON AC | 64GB RAM@XMP2933  | 2x RTX 2080Ti GPU | 4x 3TB WD Black RAID0 media drive | 3x 1TB NVMe RAID0 cache drive | SSD SATA system drive | AX1600i PSU | Decklink 12G Extreme | Samsung UHD reference monitor (calibrated)

farss wrote on 3/22/2009, 4:17 AM
Me thinks we need to be a little careful with our use of the terms Computer and Studio RGB here.

Depending on how you use some of the HDV / XDCAM cameras the Y' values go from 16 to 255. That's neither computer or studio RGB.

If you encode that directly to mpeg-2 and make a DVD it'll probably be OK on both a CRT and a PC's LCD as the worst that can happen is the player clamps the whites to 235. i.e. you loose a bit of detail in the highlights.

If you use an FX to do a Studio to Computer conversion the blacks will be correct for computerRGB but the highlights will be toasted a bit more than you might like. That's why I watch the scopes and get things lined up to a standard and then convert from that.

Bob.
musicvid10 wrote on 3/22/2009, 11:42 AM
Thanks for confirming some of my impressions.

Out of curiousity, I just checked almost 5 hours of source footage from two (XLH-1) cameras, and our paid shooter had kept everything easily within 16-235 save for a few specular jewelry reflections. Kind of nice when you don't have to worry about it from the get-go.

As an experiment, I applied Studio->Computer RGB to a well-lit scene from the same shoot, made a dvd, and it plays just fine on anything I throw it at. If there is any additional highlight compression taking place, I am at a loss to detect it.
TheHappyFriar wrote on 3/22/2009, 3:04 PM
If you encode that directly to mpeg-2 and make a DVD it'll probably be OK on both a CRT and a PC's LCD as the worst that can happen is the player clamps the whites to 235. i.e. you loose a bit of detail in the highlights.

wondering out loud.... do DVD players auto-fix to studio RGB like they auto-take care of interlacing progressive footage for interlaced tv's & auto-convert 24fps to 30fps for NTSC tv's?
GlennChan wrote on 3/22/2009, 8:53 PM
You either convert or do nothing depending on what the encoding codec expects. It's as simple as that as far as the levels conversions go.
http://www.glennchan.info/articles/vegas/colorspaces/colorspaces.html

2- Yes, cameras will record illegal values. The right thing to do is to clip them off. This way your material will look consistent from TV to TV (e.g. because CRTs are capable of showing these illegal values, while I don't think LCD TVs will do it). In signal processing down the chain, these illegal values may or may not be clipped (either can happen). If you don't have these illegal values in the first place then you wouldn't need to worry about this.

If you want to recover additional highlight detail then you can map those values into the legal range.
See the first link and/or this article:
http://www.glennchan.info/articles/vegas/color-correction/tutorial.htm
ScorpioProd wrote on 3/22/2009, 10:36 PM
Those are some great info pages and tutorials, Glenn, thanks! :)

One question though, for making Blu-ray discs, those would also use Studio RGB, correct?

Thanks.
ushere wrote on 3/22/2009, 11:21 PM
now glenn, if i'd been a good boy and read your pages BEFORE posting, this thread would have never come into existence!!!

thanks for a clear, concise and easily understood explanation.....

leslie
GlennChan wrote on 3/23/2009, 12:47 AM


So bluray would be mpeg2 or mpeg4... can't remember. But in Vegas, the default mpeg2 and mpeg4 codecs, from what I remember, behave the same.
In 8-bit, they expect studio RGB levels.
In 32-bit projects, they expect computer RGB levels.



Heh...
musicvid10 wrote on 3/23/2009, 8:52 AM
"now glenn, if i'd been a good boy and read your pages BEFORE posting, this thread would have never come into existence!!!"

Yes, but then dozens of people would have missed out on a very interesting discussion and the benefit of the shared learning curve. These threads serve a purpose even if the guy with all the right answers waits until the end to drop in.

Thanks to Glenn and everyone else who contributed; although it probably won't change my workflow, it has given something else to be aware of and I've learned something I didn't know before.