Comments

ryclark wrote on 8/15/2017, 7:51 AM

But Vegas isn't a DAW it is a video editing programme. Improvements in audio are always gratefully received but don't go overboard so that the prime target of Video NLE is compromised. I'm afraid that if you need a DAW then you buy the appropriate software that specialises in Audio production.

rraud wrote on 8/15/2017, 12:01 PM

Along as they (Magix) does not start removing audio functions, (like SCS did with Sound Forge.. non-audio folks making what's-useful-and-what's-not decisions) I can live with it... though I still have to resort to SloTools for some things, side-chaining for instance.

songsj wrote on 8/15/2017, 7:28 PM

If I get respectfully dissed one more time for asking about Vegas audio improvements I think I will scream. I spent many hours years ago learning Vegas as Audio production software when it was being at least in part marketed to that consumer group. I really liked the work flow and it's capabilities at that time. I was laughed at by more than one Pro Tools, Cubase and Cakewalk user. I guess they were right. I can live without Vegas and I will. I have already moved to Reaper but was hoping Vegas would at least move a little ahead in the audio world. Like supporting VST3, and fixing the audio playback glitches. I am not asking a lot as I track on other equipment and mix only on computer. Without audio changes/updates Edit Pro 14 will be the last Vegas software for me. I may be a slow learner but am not crazy. No sense going where I am not wanted as a customer.

Kinvermark wrote on 8/15/2017, 9:09 PM

keep in mind that Magix already had some pretty serious DAW software before they acquired Vegas, so that will impact their thinking. Also, a new version of ACID Pro is apparently in the works, so you may want to take a look at that in the future. I would definitely like to see some synergy between Vegas and ACID.